Answer: Imperialism and colonialism are terms that are often used in many ways and perhaps for this same reason, often used interchangeably. These are concepts that can be difficult to define, but it is important to understand that they do not mean the same thing.
Imperialism is defined as the policy or tendency of a nation to extend its control over other states. It is exercised politically, socially and economically. The imperialist nations extend their control, power and their rules. They control the political and economic life of other nations. The concept of imperialism is much broader than that of colonialism. It can be exercised formally, informally, directly or indirectly. Informal imperialism can be achieved through various methods, such as; not allowing weaker states to achieve or maintain their independence or by reducing their sovereignty.
Colonialism can be defined as a product of imperialism and is commonly associated with the formal control exerted by a nation over a weak state (colony), from which resources are exploited; that is, a nation takes over a territory or State and the resources it possesses. Colonialism refers to the action of governing a territory. Unlike imperialism, it is about extending control more and more. When it is colonized, it is sought that the colony becomes dependent on who dominates it and the natives of said colony are subdued or displaced. Colonization is one of the ways in which imperialism operates. please mark me as brainiest
Answer:
Racism and bias against African-Americans caused many white sports players to refuse African-Americans as owners of their teams. Many people, especially white southerners, found it hard to believe black people were capable of owning professional jobs such as sports teams, so they had no support from anyone in owning those teams.
Explanation:
When Jackie Robinson signed with the Dodgers, many of his teammates doubted him because he was black, so he had to work extra hard to gain recognition in the team.
Answer: TreatyT of Hellgate (1855) Treaty of Medicine Creek (1854) Treaty of Neah Bay signed with the Makah (1855), Treaty of point Ellliot (1855), Point no point treaty (1855), Quinault treaty, Treaty of Walla Walla (1855)
Explanation: I added dates and some names, I hope this is ok.
The mandate system had the effect of creating new borders and new countries that exist to this day in the Middle East. It also set up some future issues for Middle East conflict.
Context/detail:
When World War I erupted, the Ottoman Empire sided with Germany as part of the "Central Powers." In the end, the Central Powers lost and the Turkish empire of the Ottomans ceased to exist as an empire. Turkey remained as a country, but it lost control over other territories that it had held before.
The League of Nations created a system for governing former German and Ottoman territories, called "the mandate system." The mandate system authorized a member nation of the League of Nations to govern a former German or Turkish colonial area after the conclusion of World War I. There were mandate territories for former German territories in Africa and Asia, as well for former Ottoman territories in the Middle East.
The former Turkish provinces of Syria, Iraq and Palestine in the Middle East were divided into a French mandate territory and British mandate territory. The British mandate rule over Palestine, in particular, has much to do with the history of the development of the Arab-Israeli conflict.
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
You forgot to include the question. Here we just have some sentences but no question at all.
However, trying to help, we can comment on the following.
A political system has different levels of government. In some democratic countries, it is called a Federation. This Federation is comprised of different states and provinces with the faculty of self-governing under a set of central laws or a constitution. As a political entity, the federation has branches that direct the order and legislation of states, provinces, municipalities, and local governments.
In the case of the United States, the federal government was created by the founding fathers as a division of powers under the system of checks and balances, in which each of the three branches of the federal government has no power over the other two.