The four main causes were: militarism, alliances, imperialism and nationalism - or as an acronym, M-A-I-N (this made it much easier for me to remember the causes)
Answer:
The International Encyclopedia of the First World War defines attrition warfare as “the sustained process of wearing down an opponent so as to force their physical collapse through continuous losses in personnel, equipment and supplies or [wearing] them down to such an extent that their will to fight collapses.”
Explanation:
don't forget to brainllest:)
Answer:
$ 421,000
Explanation:
Gross Profit = $ 701,800 - $ 280,800 = $ 421,000
Explanation:
Ethical communication has several principles or foundational elements. Communicating fact-based messages honestly and accurately is central to ethical communication. Ethical communication values freedom of expression, diversity of perspective and tolerance of dissent. But while ethical communication should be honest and straightforward, it should never offend or provoke listeners.
Ethical communication allows access to the resources and facts that helped formulate the message. For example, if you are sharing information about stock performance, you are obligated to provide your audience with annual reports, filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission or shareholder reports.
Communicating in an ethical manner also requires making the message accessible. This means if you are delivering a message to a large or diverse audience, ensure that you accommodate the languages and listening preferences of everybody. Even though the official language in the U.S. is English, there are millions of visitors and legal residents whose first language is not English. To deliver a message that can be understood by a diverse audience requires engaging linguists or translators who can assist you in making the message accessible to all.
In addition to making the message accessible and respecting the diversity of thought and perspective, ethical communication means being considerate of basic human needs. Avoiding words and language that are demeaning or intolerant and refraining from messages that promote or incite violence is paramount to ethical communication.
None of those are actually true. The Soviet Union didn't have any missiles in Turkey, it was actually the U.S. that had ICBMs near the Caucuses. They would later be dismantled because of the Cuban Missile Crisis. Khrushchev certainly didn't agree to allow American forces to occupy Cuba and Remove Castro. The U.S. didn't back down, President Kennedy stood his ground and eventually Khrushchev removed the missile sites from Cuba. Lastly, Kennedy and Khrushchev didn't divide the island of Cuba between the U.S. and the USSR. What actually happened <span>was that Khrushchev agreed to remove Russian missiles from Cuba in exchange for a promise from the United States to respect Cuba’s territorial sovereignty</span>
