Answer:
No
Explanation:
No, the compromise of 1850 was not enough to resolve the differences between the north and south. Throughout the 19th century, the north was constantly making compromises to appease the south regarding slavery as they knew with time their policies frustrated the southern states more and more. The compromise of 1850 made it so California would be a free state, but potential new territories could have slavery if voted by that state. However, the majority of new territories were eventually occupied by northerners, meaning they would become free states as well, angering the South. In general, it's safe to say that the compromise did not resolve the differences as not even two decades later, the south attempted to break from the union and become the confederacy.
Answer:
in this he fully articulated a view that had been gathering force in the colonies (it was ... The standpoints of the two sides to the controversy could be traced in the ... at last found a minister who could work both with himself and with Parliament. ... had the British legislature intervened in the operation of the constitution .
Explanation:
I have chose primary source to be the answer. Check out the definition of "primary source." secondary wouldn't make sense here.
Some moved around a lot so it helped them travel place to place and got them food
Answer:
Enslaved Africans became vital to the cultivation of tobacco and soon made up nearly 50% of the population in the Chesapeake and Southern colonies.
Explanation:
