This question has been debated throughout the study of psychology since it was founded. Currently there is no solid answer to this question.
Answer:
C
Explanation:
which is why they needed to institute a new government of their own and not follow the ideas of others.
Answer:
complex sentence.
Explanation:
Complex sentences are made of at least one independent clause and one dependent clause.
An independent clause contains one idea, is composed of a subject and a verb and can stand alone. In this case the independent clause is "fix yourself a snack".
A dependent clause is not a complete clause and has to be attached to an independent clause to become complete. In this case the dependent clause is "If you start to feel hungry".
Note that if the clause begins with the dependent clause a coma should follow but if the clause begins with the independent clause there should be no coma separating both clauses.
Mark me as brainliest
Kindly refer to the above attachment!!
Answer:
C. Criticism of women’s athletic fashion does not stop eventual progress and change.
Explanation:
In her article titled "Serena Williams' catsuit controversy evokes the battle over women wearing shorts" Deirdre Clemente talks about the criticism faced by women athletes for their dress code.
Throughout the article, the author has not shared her viewpoint on the subject but the tone and the usage of words clearly send the message to the readers that she is criticizing those who criticize women athletes' dress code.
From the given options the sentence that vocalizes the author's opinion about women's athletic dress code is C. The author concludes her article by showing the critics of Serena that she won the U.S open match a few days later criticism by wearing a tulle tutu. The conclusion of the article means that though there are critics of women's athletics dress code, the progress and change won't stop.
