Answer:
B) A chocolate chip cookie
Explanation:
The options you were given are:
A) A glass of apple juice;
B) A chocolate chip cookie;
C) A mixture of salt and water;
D) A mixture of sugar and water.
A solution is an even (homogeneous) mixture of substances, meaning that the individual components cannot be made out. Apple juice is an even, clear liquid, and so are mixtures of water and salt or sugar, as both salt and sugar are water-soluble. Out of the listed mixtures, a chocolate chip cookie is the only one that is not a solution - different components are visible to the human eye as they are not evenly distributed throughout the sample (unlike sugar and salt in water, which are not visible despite existing on the molecular level). Based on that, we can easily conclude that a chocolate chip cookie is a heterogeneous mixture.
The testimony regarding the man’s conduct during the three prior arrests is:
- The reason for this is that the prior events serve as impermissible character evidence.
<h3>What is irrelevant evidence?</h3>
Irrelevant evidence is the type of evidence that does not apply to the issue at hand and can cause a distortion of the facts.
In the case of the police officer in question, the evidence that he wants to present will cause confusion about the issues and possibly mislead the jury.
Learn more about irrelevant evidence here:
brainly.com/question/1865742
#SPJ1
Complete question:
A man has sued a police officer, alleging that the officer violated the man's civil rights by using excessive force while arresting him. At trial, the officer admits to having hit the man in the head with the butt of his gun but contends that the force was necessary because the man was resisting arrest. In support of his contention, the officer seeks to introduce evidence that the man had resisted arrest on three prior occasions during the last 10 years.
Is this testimony regarding the man’s conduct during the three prior arrests admissible?
Answer:
I need points so don't know