Answer:
A) The first is a prediction about a recommendation the main argument opposes; the second is a conclusion drawn in order to support the main conclusion.
Explanation:
From the argument above by the two senators, it could be seen that the two Senators are argueing in favour and argainst the Tax. Senator Baker, was of the believe that his opponent, Senator Rothmore calling for increase in taxes to fund programs helps the long-term unemployed.
His argument was based soley on the unemployed without factoring in the small businesses that would be killed off as a result of the tax increment. The fall of small businesses would definitely affect the prediction he made about unemployed getting work. This is because, those unemployed can only work by the opportunities created by the small businesses.
Senator Baker only made the second conclusion inorder to support his argument on the need to lower taxes which would drive job creations thereby being a win-win situation for both the government and the citizens.
Answer:
1. Recognize that good corporate governance is not just about compliance. ...
2. Clarify the board's role in strategy and risk management. ...
3. Monitor organizational performance. ...
4. Build a skills-based, diverse board. ...
5.Appoint an effective, competent chairperson. ...
6. Support equal voices for all board members
They were important because they made up a part of what is going on today, Hope this helps :)
:<span>Leslie loved clothes and hoped to become a designer, so she quit her job at the convenience store and moved back to her parents' home in Arizona.</span>
she has anger issues and/or he cheated on her and/or she is anger
Explanation:
