Answer:
Two reasons. One, it not only allows for a smaller federal government (which is what the Founding Fathers wanted) and two, it has cultural significance to show the relative independence of each state
Explanation:
<u>Own sewage systems After the Public Health Act;</u>
The 1848 Public Health Act was the absolute first law on general wellbeing to be passed in the United Kingdom. It set up a Central Board of Health whose activity it was to improve sanitation and expectations for everyday comforts in towns and crowded territories in England and Wales.
Its motivation was to arrange past measures planned for fighting messy urban living conditions, which caused different wellbeing dangers, including the spread of numerous illnesses, for example, cholera and typhus.
In July 1842, the most significant nineteenth Century production on social change was discharged, titled, 'Report on the Sanitary Condition of the Laboring Population of Great Britain'.
This investigation into sanitation was the mind offspring of a legal counselor, Edwin Chadwick (1800-1890). It took such huge numbers of years for the administration to move different urban areas to make their own sewage frameworks.
Answer:if im sure it is D
Ida Tarbell (1857 – 1944) pertained to the generation of journalists called muckrackers, who investigated and denounced corruption and unethical practices perpetrated by businesses and government officials during the Progressive Era (late 19th century and early 20th century) in the US.
She published <em>"The History of the Standard Oil Company</em>" in 1904 through which she set a precedent, and many others subsequently started to gather information and to denounce the abuses committed by companies with absolute market power (monopolies) or by trusts operating in olipolistic markets. The Sherman Antitrust Act had been recently passed in 1890 but firms had been able to freely limit competitiveness during the whole 19th century. Tarbell denounced the manner in which certain corporations gathered enormous fortunes by using anti-competitive practices, possible due to their dominant position in the markets, and also impeding others to participate on the profits of the industry.
Such monopolistic practices enlarged the inequality within the industry and also in the whole society where large fortunes started to appear while most people were humble factory workers who earned very modest salaries.
