Correct answer: An association of nations and open diplomacy.
Explanation:
The 14 Points were set forth by US President Woodrow Wilson in a speech he delivered to Congress in January, 1918. The 14 Points were his proposals for how to end the Great War (World War I) and establish international peace.
Quickly summarized, these were Wilson's 14 points:
- Agreements between countries must be open, not secret.
- Freedom of navigation on the seas by all nations at all times.
- Free trade between countries accepting the peace, removing economic barriers between them.
- All nations reduce their weapons and armies "to the lowest point consistent with domestic safety."
- Adjustment of colonial claims in a fair and impartial way.
- All German troops will leave Russian territory.
- All foreign troops leave Belgium, and Belgian independence and sovereignty be restored.
- French territory should be restored, including the disputed region of Alsace-Lorraine.
- Readjustment of the borders of Italy "along clearly recognizable lines of nationality."
- Austria-Hungary retain a place among the nations, but the peoples of Austria-Hungary should be granted the accorded for independence if they so choose.
- The Central Powers' troops will leave the Balkans, and the Balkan states should enjoy political and economic independence.
- Turkey shall remain as its own country, but other nationalities under the Ottoman Empire "should be assured an undoubted security of life" and "opportunity of autonomous development."
- Poland is to be an independent country.
- "A general association of nations must be formed under specific covenants for the purpose of affording mutual guarantees of political independence and territorial integrity to great and small states alike." - I quoted the 14th point in full, as this idea from Woodrow Wilson led to the formation of the League of Nations.
Answer:
The European countries were able to colonise African countries rapidly because there were rivalries between African leaders. These kings and chiefs were competing with each other to be the richest and most powerful within their tribes.
Explanation:
Looks good to me! Probably longer though
<span>Is this a matter of constitutional, criminal, civil, or military law? How do you know? It's a civil law because it's a misunderstanding between two civilians.
</span><span>Is the source of the law a statute, regulation, case law, or combination? How do you know? I believe it might be a combination of statue and regulation law because there's some documentation and exchange item.
</span>Determine the purpose of the law related to the scenario. Is the law intended to protect people's safety or people's rights? It is to protect the people's rights, not safety. " She says that he has not made any payments and still has possession of the car." <span>The disagreement is over a vehicle which is just property.
</span>Do you think the young woman has a valid argument that her neighbor owes her payment for the car? In other words, should government make an exception to the law about the owner being the person whose name is on the title? I think she does not have a valid argument. "<span> She signed ownership over to him on the title, which he also signed. She says that he has not made any payments and still has possession of the car." </span><span>If she wants to sell her car, she should have done it the proper way, otherwise she should be prepared to meet the consequences.
</span>
