Answer: self-determination was placed in only for Europe, and not in the outer territories and this came to be known as the system of mandates.
Explanation: The system of mandates led to freeing some of the colonies under German control only for them to be put under control of the allies such as England and France.
Self-determination is a political principle an is the process by which a group of people form their own state and choose their own government. In World War I the Allies accepted self-determination as a peace aim.
In Eastern Europe, when the German, Austrian, and Russian empires fell, many nations emerged and this self-determination led to the creation of many nations such as Czechoslovakia, Poland, the Baltic states, and Yugoslavia. However, by creating mandates outside Europe, the treaties ignored non-European peoples' right to self determination.
The human characteristic of North Carolina that mostly impacted European settlement of the area is the "Agricultural fields that had been developed by native people provided plentiful food for Europeans."
This is evident in the fact that following the Virginia settlement of the British settlers, the European began to move outward, and by 1655, a certain Nathaniel Batts, among other Europeans like John Harvey had hoped to find better farmland in the Albemarle area in Carolina, having seen the Native Americans developed some of the lands with agricultural produce. Subsequently, in the later years, many European settlers moved from Virginia to the Carolina area in the hope to find fertile land for farming.
Hence, The human characteristic of North Carolina that mostly impacted European settlement of the area is the "Agricultural fields that had been developed by native people provided plentiful food for Europeans."
Learn more here: brainly.com/question/17429337
It is germs any type of germs
hope this helps
<span>Holmes dissented due to a belief that the opinion represented judicial activism, most specifically that it represented positions not held by the majority of the country. Moreover, he argued that the economic theory that was being used in the decision was not embodied in the Constitution.</span>
