1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
coldgirl [10]
3 years ago
7

Why did fewer towns develop in the southern colonies compared to the New England colonies?

History
2 answers:
IrinaVladis [17]3 years ago
7 0

I think an educated guess would be C

notka56 [123]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

Your answer is D. The plantations were huge and far apart, so the population was scattered.

Explanation:

The Southern colonies back then were in their time of slavery. The Northern area (including the New England colonies of Massachusetts, Rhode Island, New Hampshire, Connecticut) was more on the industrial side. With new and improved machines, they did not need slaves to do the work.

As we all know, big cities tend have a quite compacted population.

Down in the South, the land was much more spread out because they did not have all of those technologies and relied on slavery. The South had farms and plantations. These plantations were indeed, huge and far apart.

So, out of your options, the one that makes the most sense is D. The plantations were huge and far apart, so the population was scattered.

<em>~</em><em>Kicho [nm68]</em>

You might be interested in
Henry Ford was the first entrepreneur to implement which strategy
Neporo4naja [7]
Henry Ford was the first entrepreneur to implement assembly line production. There is some discussion as to whether it was actually Ford himself that truly came up with the idea of bringing the assembly line into the factory, but it cannot be argued that never before had it been done with quite that level of success.
4 0
4 years ago
????????????????????
myrzilka [38]

Answer:

What is the question?

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What made world war 2 a total war
elena-s [515]
The answer to this question is:

What made world war 2 a total war<span>"The war effort required American civilians to contribute"

Hoped This Helped, </span><span>Davidtbeardenov0i5p
Your Welcome :)</span>
5 0
4 years ago
What what was not true about the economy at the end of world war 2
Lyrx [107]
It wasn't true for the economies at the end of the World War 2
was that the GNP and corporate profits doubled.
5 0
4 years ago
HELP!!!!! Read the excerpt from Sojourner Truth's speech.
cupoosta [38]

Answer: A, women were just as strong as men, i believe

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What kind of bills have to start in the house or representatives?
    15·2 answers
  • Which statement best describes the development of political parties throughout United States history?
    11·1 answer
  • Which statement best describes the situation in the United States after the holocast
    10·1 answer
  • What law that was passed allowed the U.S. to build the transcontinental railroad across the central United States?
    5·1 answer
  • Which of the following is an example of absolute chronology?
    8·1 answer
  • During this era ,which two economic philosophies were predominant
    10·1 answer
  • what would happen if the family owed $10,000 on the property, but were only able to sell it for $6,000?
    6·1 answer
  • A major strength of the Articles of Confederation was that they —
    13·1 answer
  • 7. Supporters of the New Jersey Plan
    14·1 answer
  • 1. How did the invention of the steam locomotive impact the job market in the 1800s? (1 point)
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!