Hhhiguyggfyfvbgubhuvghvhbnnhgjnj
Explanation:jhhhhhhhh
Answer:
The loyalty of David’s men ran deep and David cherished these men. In 2 Samuel 23:13-17 we read about a time when David was hiding from Saul and probably having spent days without much water nor food said longingly how he wished to drink from the waters of Bethlehem. Bethlehem at the time was under the control of the Philistines, but when his men heard David’s words, three of them snuck through the Philistine lines to get that water for David.
David’s response to their generous act showed the love and appreciation he had for their sacrifice. Instead of drinking the water, he poured the water out to God. He felt that was the only way that he could honor how they had risked their lives to get him the water in the first place. His response showed the heart of David, a man after God’s own heart, and it stands in great contrast to his callous message to Joab after Uriah’s death many years later, “for the sword devours now one and now another.”As much as David was called to be king, David’s Mighty Men were called to support him. God used these men to help establish David’s kingdom. Like David, Uriah answered his call and was faithful to the end and played his part in bringing about God’s promise.
Even though this event with Uriah is tragic and definitely leaves a bad impression of David, I love that God has imperfect leaders. His imperfect heroes reminds us every day people that God’s requirement is not perfection. It reminds me that you do not have to wait to be perfect to serve his purposes. But I wanted to bring Uriah’s story to light, a lesser known and almost forgotten hero. He too was a leader of men, a great warrior, faithful to God, and faithful to his mission. He also was God’s faithful servant
Explanation:
Answer:
The three dimensions of relationship-level meanings are liking or disliking, responsiveness, and power control. Encoding your thoughts and feeling into a intended message.
The structure of the story creates tension because he uses vague descriptions to talk about the relationship between Susan's family and Saleh Hamadi.
<h3>What is the structure of the story?</h3>
The author makes use of a sequential description to describe the school life of Susan in high school to her admiration of Saleh Hamadi and her family's relationship with him.
Hence, we can see that based on the text, there is the vague description of Saleh Hamadi as Susan's father cannot remember how they met and also the fact that Saleh Hamadi has lived in a hotel for a very long time helps creat tension and add to the meaning of the story,
Read more about Saleh Hamadi here:
brainly.com/question/6078025
#SPJ1
The negative trait of Armida that irritated her friend was possessiveness, as shown in option B in the first question. The lesson Armida learned from the chicks was that if a chick is held too tightly, he will fight, as shown in option D.
<h3>What happened to Armida?</h3>
- She took friendship very seriously.
- She was possessive of her friend.
- She didn't allow her friend to have other interests.
Armida proved to be a very suffocating friend. She was possessive of her friend and wanted that friend to always live up to what she wanted. This caused her friend to move away, which made her very sad.
When playing with chicks, she understood that if she holds a chick too tightly, the chick will pull away from her, just as she did with her friend.
More information about friendships at the link:
brainly.com/question/26627248
