The most likely reason mexican citizens had conflicting views of porfirio Diaz’s rule is because He limited citizens' freedoms but he increased foreign investments and improved infrastructure. This is further explained below.
<h3>What is Diaz’s rule?</h3>
Generally, During the president of Porfirio Daz (1876–80; 1884–1911), Mexico witnessed considerable development but political rights were constrained and the free press was muzzled. This era is known as the Porfiriato.
In conclusion, The fact that Porfirio Diaz restricted citizens' freedoms while boosting foreign investment and improving infrastructure is the most likely source of the mixed opinions that Mexicans held of his leadership.
Read more about Diaz’s rule
brainly.com/question/774392
#SPJ1
The further ways that Deng Xiaoping could have improved the lives of the people of China are:
- Agriculture
- Industry
- Defense
- Science and technology
<h3>Who is Deng Xiaoping?</h3>
This refers to the revolutionary leader of China and was the supreme leader of China from December 1978 to 1992
Hence, we can see that although Deng Xiaoping brought about several changes, we can see that he also wanted to do more in the areas of agriculture, defense, industry, etc.
Read more about Deng Xiaoping here:
brainly.com/question/831291
#SPJ1
It is false! I quote 'False' Believe Me M8
Answer:
The implication in Lee’s reports that his goals in the Gettysburg campaign were limited, and largely achieved, is at least partly consistent with some modern studies of the campaign. They challenge the traditional view that Gettysburg was a disastrous Confederate defeat that shattered Lee’s hopes for a war-winning victory on Northern soil. They also reject the notion that Gettysburg was a crucial turning point toward ultimate Union victory in the war. According to historians who question these traditional interpretations, Lee’s incursion into Pennsylvania was a raid, not an invasion. A smashing victory over the Army of the Potomac would have been a nice bonus, but it was not the main goal of the raid. The Union victory at Gettysburg was merely defensive, and the Army of Northern Virginia got away with its spoils and lived to fight another day— indeed, many other days, as the war continued for almost two more years. It was only in retrospect and in memory that Gettysburg became the climactic battle and turning point of the war.
Explanation:
Some of these arguments are self-evidently correct. The war did go on for almost two more years, and the Confederacy still had a chance to win it as late as August 1864 by wearing out the Northern will to continue fighting. Rebel foraging parties did scour hundreds of square miles of south-central Pennsylvania for whatever they could find and take—including many African Americans carried back to Virginia into slavery.
Hope this helps : )
Forced to accept Blane for ww1 and the economic conditions
