Some examples is the holocaust in 1933 and Armenia 1915
Charles Schenck and Elizabeth Baer were convicted under the 1917 Espionage Act for mailing leaflets encouraging men to resist the military draft. They appealed to the Supreme Court on the grounds that the conviction violated their free speech rights.
The Supreme Court upheld their convictions, ruling that speech that creates a “clear and present danger” (by encouraging violence or insurrection, or endangering national security) is not protected by the First Amendment.
Armed with that knowledge it affected everyone as they could walk into an air port, say they have a you know what and not get in trouble, now they would get in trouble with a whole list of charges. this also heavily affected the way criminals behaved as they have to be very careful what they say to certain people as that could pick them up an additional charge.
<span>Usually, we hear people say that "The United States of America (for example) is a republic and not a democracy." You ask; what is the difference? The word "republican" applies to the character of the nation-state.A monarchy, for example, is not a republic. Saudi Arabia is a monarchy. Russia is a republic. The government of a monarchy invested in the King. The King is empowered by God. The government of republic can take many forms such as elected representative democracy or single-party communist state. But a republic draws its authority from the people. Democracy is having the character of the people. A republic that is based on democratic principles draws its authority from the people. A republic can be democratic or dictatorial. North Korea is a republic. Its full name is "The Democratic People's Republic of Korea." Even dictators thrive to be seen as democratic, even when they are not. The "Islamic Republic of Iran" has dozens of supposedly democratic institutions and elections. Fundamentally though those choices are limited to the people by the theocratic nature of the government.Iran is actually a Theocracy where a state religion rules. It may be important to realize that this issue is not a question another countries that either is well schooled in Government in general and/or do not have two major political parties namedRepublicans and Democrats.</span>
Answer:
The Civil War greatly improved the economy of the North but harmed the economy of the South. The Civil War disrupted the Southern economy badly. First of all, it freed the slaves, thus removing the bulk of the Southern work force and forcing the South to readjust its economy.
Explanation:
Answer:
The causes of famine were both natural and political. Natural causes included drought*, especially a delay in the arrival of the autumn rains; pests that destroyed crops; and floods. Political causes included the destruction that resulted from war or siege, including the purposeful burning of an enemy city's fields.
Explanation:
