This is a thought-provoking letter written by Kurt Vonnegut opposing the idea of burning books of young children, in view of transforming the system of education in America.
Explanation:
In this letter, Vonnegut starts telling audience/readers the ideas that can have a negative effect, not only on the target person/individual, but also on a wider range because of its effect being new and historic.
Though in view of a change, Vonnegut argues that this act of burning books is not what we all should accept. In Paragraphs 7 and 8, when Vonnegut explains about how people feel it is their right to decide what their children must read, the author explains to them that it is true but doing that in an un-American way - harsh, impractical, ignorant manner can cause a negative impact for them.
In the next point of argument, author talks about how people/nations who didn't read books, didn't let ideas emerge among people fought wars. They created destruction all over world. The author clearly states that people/nations who read books have been a part of development, improvement and liberation.
Hi girl boy it the answer is a
Answer:
I think it's correct answer A. is
I hope it's helpful for you...
The best term which captures the nature of the
Glorious revolution is:<span>
The
Bloodless Revolution.
<span>Apart
from that label, it is also known as the Revolution of 1688 which narrated the dethronement
of James II and the enthronement of his own daughter Mary II and her husband,
William III, referred to as Prince of Orange of the Netherlands.</span></span>
In an essay that argues cats are better than dogs, the author might go into detail about how cats are easier to take care of considering they are proven to quickly learn how to use litterboxes and keep that trait their entire life once learned and managed.
brainliest please))
