Owning housing option gives you more freedom and more responsibilities.
Explanation:
Owning a house has the following benefits:
- more freedom
- more responsibilities
- lower costs in long-term
- high appreciation value
Renting housing option factors are as follows:
- less freedom
- less responsibilities
- higher costs in long-term
- more flexibility
As per the above question, Owning housing option gives you more freedom and more responsibilities.
<span>It resulted in the creation of a number of independent countries in Latin America.</span>
Answer:
1. to give the legislature the power to pass new laws
2. to discourage racial mixing
3. to retain public support
Explanation:
The Pearsall Plan, which was a response of the North Carolina to the ruling of the United States Supreme Court on the unconstitutionality of racial segregation in public schools.
Created in 1956, Pearsall Plan sought a moderate approach to mix their public schools, however, in the bid to achieve their goal, the plan gave reason the state (North Carolina) should amend her Constitution, to reach common ground on the issue. The following are the reasons given:
1. to give the legislature the power to pass new laws: this enable the legislature to passed legislation that delay the integration.
2. to discourage racial mixing: there is also amendment of Compulsory School Attendance Law which excused students from going to integrated schools, there by discouraging racial mixing in public schools.
3. to retain public support of school: the plan seek to give more power to the school board which in turn, helps to retain public school supports.
Thereafter, in the case of Godwin v. Johnston County Board of Education (1969), ruled the Pearsall Plan unconstitutional.
The third opinion is the correct one
Answer:
Anti-competitive practices are business or government practices that prevent or reduce competition in a market. In commercial law this can lead to unfair (or disloyal) competition, a deceptive business practice that causes economic harm to other businesses or to consumers.]The debate about the morality of certain business practices termed as being anti-competitive has continued both in the study of the history of economics and in the popular culture.
