Hello there!
Let's take note of some things first. When a argument occurs, there's always two different kind of people. You would have someone who think he has a point and he explains his opinion on this matter, and then you would have the other opponent who would most likely say the complete opposite of this other person.
Now, when conduction the argument of the topic "cell phones", there would be a ton of different opinions on this matter.
For an example:
(Person #1) - opposer.
Cell Phone's are very useful, when you need to call a person, you would have something to communicate with the other person. It would be encounter as a essential in our every day life.
(Person #2) - opposer.
I believe that Cell Phones are unsafe. People could track you down and hurt you to the full. They can take your information, and then you would have some several bad cases on this matter. I believe that Cell Phones are not safe.
__________
Based on looking at this example here, you would see on how they're are two different opinions here. They both have different explanations.
I hope this helps you!
Answer:
Prioritized list
Explanation:
Step 3 of the decision-making process is to identify alternatives or options. Therefore, finding many options so that the individual cannot make any wrong decision during the time of choosing the right option. If the person identifies the various options, he or she can choose the most optimal list. In that case, testing, or brainstorming activity cannot help to proceed with alternatives. Prioritizing the list will be helpful to approach in 3rd step to find the best possible options. Therefore, option D is the answer.
Answer:
Units Completed and Transferred: 2,700
Explanation:
Units Completed and Transferred: Beginning Units in Process + Units Received - Ending Units in Process
Beginning Units in Process: 400
Units Received: 2,500
<u>Ending Units in Process: (200)</u>
Units Completed and Transferred: 2,700
When compared to the country of origin principle, the country of reception approach to jurisdiction over internet transactions requires business managers to have more knowledge of the laws of other countries.
<h3>What is the significance of country of origin principle?</h3>
The country of origin principle is an important feature of leading parts of Union law. It is also known as<u> home country control, </u><u>country</u><u> of </u><u>origin</u><u> rule</u>, and <u>country of </u><u>origin</u><u> </u><u>principle</u><u>.</u>
The country of origin principle mainly aims to ensure the effective protection of the public interest in the country of origin.
Basically, the country of origin principle has the main purpose to vest exclusive jurisdiction to regulate in one Member State only.
Learn more about the country of origin principle here:-
brainly.com/question/16529312
#SPJ4
The price of designer jeans would likely increase if its demand increases and there is no changes in supply.
