1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Mademuasel [1]
2 years ago
6

How is this relocation tied to the belief in Manifest Destiny?Please no links.Only answer if you're very good at Please give a g

ood explanation.​

History
1 answer:
Anna71 [15]2 years ago
6 0

Answer:

Manifest destiny was the belief that Europeans, then Americans / white people are culturally superior to Native Americans and those of other races. It was also the belief that it was God’s plan for white people to settle all of America and to “civilize” the native people. Since the Native Americans occupied the land that the white people believed they were supposed to take over, they “needed” to relocate the Native Americans. They didn’t see this as a problem, because they saw the Native Americans as inferior to them.

You might be interested in
The site of cursuades
serious [3.7K]
The site of the fist crusade was in jurusalem
7 0
3 years ago
What was the goal of the equal rights
ICE Princess25 [194]
A united states constitutional Guarantee of equality for women.the equal right amendment states
6 0
3 years ago
The Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act of 2002 is more commonly called the __________.
BabaBlast [244]
Either the BCRA or McCain–Feingold Act
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
3. Which of the following was the main reason for the rapid settlement of the Great
valkas [14]

Answer:

manifest destiny

Explanation:

i took the test

4 0
3 years ago
7. Describe a specific situation where the principle of checks and balances could
meriva

The correct answer to this open question is the following.

A specific situation where the principle of checks and balances could be used for the good of the people would be the following.

When the President of the United States sends a bill to the US Congress, thinking that would benefit the economy of the country. For instance, a new tax. When the bill gets to Congress, the House of Representatives decides that this bill is no good for the American people and that is biased to benefit just a political group or the President's Party. Then Congress did not pass the new bill proposed by the executive branch.

Or it could be the other way around. That the President receives a law from the legislative branch and the President considers it is biased to benefit a political group. Then the President exerts his power to veto the law.

The system of checks and balances has been one of the best things implemented by the framers of the Constitution. It guarantees that none of the three branches of the federal government has more power over the other two.

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Never mind I found the correct answer
    8·2 answers
  • Effects of the proxy wars
    10·1 answer
  • Who is Big Shaq? Provide information on who he is, what he does for a living, and any other facts/information.
    6·2 answers
  • India was controlled by France,Spain or England
    10·1 answer
  • What was the purpose of the declaration issued by the Allies at Potsdam?
    6·2 answers
  • Although China’s total economic output, measured by Gross Domestic Product (GDP), is third largest in the world, it is considere
    12·2 answers
  • What natural resources were<br> abundant in America and a lowed for<br> rapid Industrialization?
    7·1 answer
  • Free African Americans did not have to worry about slavery any longer. true or false
    12·1 answer
  • Why would I want to improve my credit score? a To save money when purchasing a car loan b to earn more interest on investments c
    5·1 answer
  • Someone pls help me I will make you you brain
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!