was an American legal case in July 1925 in which a substitute high school teacher, John T. Scopes, was accused of violating Tennessee's Butler Act, which had made it unlawful to teach human evolution in any state-funded school.[1] The trial was deliberately staged in order to attract publicity to the small town of Dayton, Tennessee, where it was held. Scopes was unsure whether he had ever actually taught evolution, but he purposely incriminated himself so that the case could have a defendant
 
        
                    
             
        
        
        
Answer: D is correct.
Explanation: laws of reason are mere fictions. Philosophy of rights is dedicated to this issue but in its very fundaments there are fundamental questions that are still not answered (becase both laws of nature and laws of reason are products of human intellect, i.e. they cannot be experimentally proved. In spite of its fictitious nature, theese laws became one of the pillars of Enlightenment. French philophers, for example, attempted to ground ethics on mathematics which proved to be inviable.
 
        
             
        
        
        
if you're using plato/edmentum, the answer is A. 
 
        
             
        
        
        
Answer:
Dante Alighieri wrote The Divine Comedy
Geoffrey Chaucer wrote The Canterbury tales
Abbot Suger is related to the Gothic Style
And I am mostly sure that The Aristotelian Corpus is related to St. Thomas Aquinas.
Explanation:
Hope this helps!!
 
        
             
        
        
        
The Government of the US discouraged foreign goods to protect domestic goods from foreign competition, using the government in which it chose to restrict the import of goods from foreign countries. 
The major reasons for protecting the US from foreign goods are as follows: 
1) The government wanted to protect domestic workers from losing their jobs. Free trade would have met the workers of the domestic country exposed to foreign competition, and consequently losing their jobs. 
2) The government wanted to protect small industries which mean small industries should be protected by imposing trade restrictions to give them a chance to grow and develop to become more competitive. These industries were now working at a very small stage and incompetent to face the Giants of the global economy. 
3) The government wanted to restrict trade as it wanted to prevent the unfair trade practices which are caused due to free trade across the countries. Each country has its trade regulations which may be unfair for some countries. Such differences lead to unfair practices in the domestic market, and when such unfair practices are evident, government restrictions become mandatory.
4) Another important reason for imposing trade barriers was that the country wants to protect national security which is caused due to free trade. National insecurity is caused due to trade when a country becomes dependent upon other countries for the supply of materials or other important resources. When it comes to national security, it is important to protect domestic industries from foreign competition.
5) Finally, trade barriers are introduced by the government for reducing the bargaining in negotiations which are caused due to foreign competition, and restriction becomes an evident asset to reduce such trade negotiations. The bargaining power of the domestic industries is greatly harmed due to foreign competition in such cases government interference becomes necessary for the protection of such industries.
To know more about trade restrictions: brainly.com/question/7580546