I'm not sure which protesters you are referring to.
I would assume you are talking about Shay's Rebellion, which shows that the Articles of Confederation was not strong enough to fight off "attacks" on the hone front, leading to the Constitution.
Leopold colonized The Congo territory of Africa with the support of the Belgian government, largely due to the ambivalence of the Belgian government and their support for exploration and colonization abroad.
When European countries were going over to other countries, they formed factories and industrial cities in those places so they could produce product and those Europeans would benefit economically
White Southerns where attracted by republican policies of civil rights and racism.
While Democrats were dominant in the south before the <em>1960's</em> and Republicans were dominants in the north,<em>The civil rights movement</em> created racial tension in the South, so Republican candidates such as Senator Barry Goldwater <em>(First republican to win the south in 1964) </em>and President Richard Nixon <em>(who won the south in his reelection) </em>created the Southern Strategy.
The Southern Strategy consisted in realigning the <em>White Southern Democrats </em>to the<em> Republican Party </em>mostly by "<em>dog whistle politics</em>" (who referred to appealing to the issues that appeal to a racist rather than declaring themselves racist). They also adopted the language of states' rights and in doing so the Southern Strategy Civil Rights Protesters in the same place as feminists, environmental activists and other leftists who were challenging the status quo.
Most of the South remains dominated by Republicans nowadays.
I would say all of the above.
Money was accepted every where.
P.S. you should prob study ur work before you do this problem set again. This is the 3rd question u've asked
