12

English

2 answers:

yuradex [85]3 years ago

4 0

He did it by freeing the slaves

Slav-nsk [51]3 years ago

4 0

In this excerpt, Lincoln constantly refers to the South as "the rebellion." This serves several purposes. One of the most important ones is that by referring to the South as "the rebellion," Lincoln establishes that the North States are the ones adhering to the "Union" and therefore, the United States, while it is the Confederacy which wants to leave. Moreover, it addresses the fact that most of the slaves are located in the South, but are not considered "rebels" anymore. This shows that the real "enemies" of the Union are not Southerners, but white plantation owners who refuse to outlaw slavery.

You might be interested in

A theme in there will come soft rains

Juli2301 [7.4K]

Machines can serve as both a help and a hindrance!

6 0

3 years ago

What is meant by the statement:

sineoko [7]

Answer:

A they are the leaders in the use of social media

5 0

3 years ago

A warrior ______ a gruesome monster ______.

Ray Of Light [21]

Answer:

A warrior <u>frightens</u> a gruesome monster <u>away.</u>

Explanation:

When you complete a sentence you have to make sure that the combination o verb and predicate are compatible, and that they express in the best possible way what you are trying to say. So let's analyze the answers:

1) frightens; away: this is grammatically correct, and both words combine well and add meaning to the message.

2) splits; in half: this is grammatically incorrect, it would have to be "into halves" or "in two"

3) kills; forever: kills already implies is forever, it is repetitive

4)beats; in pieces: beats doesn't imply that the monster was split into pieces, so these two words don't combine.

8 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Which of the following are examples of indirect characterization of a main character? Select all that apply.

Alex787 [66]

1,2, and 4 would be indirect. 3 would be direct.

7 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

PLZ HELP! QUESTION IS BELOW! :d

poizon [28]

Answer:

Understanding self and others

Explanation:

Liz damages Nicole's cherished possessions because she does not treat them with respect. Rather than telling Nicole the truth and giving her the opportunity to repair or salvage the damaged tea set, Liz lies to Nicole and discards her heirlooms, incorrectly believing that a more expensive tea set is better. When Liz tries to give Nicole the new tea set Nicole didn't accept it. Liz then thought Nicole was being ungrateful. However for Nicole, the real value of the tea set was the history attached to it not its material worth. Not only did Liz not understand Nicole she didn't understand herself because she doesn't understand how rude and disrespectful she's really being. She thinks Nicole is being disrespectful but she's the disrespectful one by not telling Nicole the truth and ruining her possessions.

3 0

3 years ago