1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
baherus [9]
3 years ago
8

Which of the following is the reason why Tsar Nicholas II abdicated in February 1917, right in the middle of World War I?

History
1 answer:
Reika [66]3 years ago
7 0

The correct answer is C. The tsar abdicated in protest over the failures of the Russian military against the German army.

Explanation

Nicholas II (1868 - 1918) is the name of the last Russian Tsar from 1894 until his abdication in 1917 due to the ruin of the monarchical government, the successive Russian defeats in the First World War, the February Revolution. Additionally, in 1917 the internal situation of Russia was going through a difficult time due to the fact that Russia was losing the war against Germany, and the internal situation was stressed by the nascent revolutions. Therefore, Nicholas II decided to give way to the provisional government thorugh his abdicate. According to the above, the correct answer is C. The tsar abdicated in protest over the failures of the Russian military against the German army.

You might be interested in
Which architect tried to make his buildings blend in with the landscape?
Snezhnost [94]
The answer is A. Frank Lloyd Wright

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Two level of government under federalism ??
Liula [17]
National and State goverment
8 0
3 years ago
Which Native American groups attempted to resist the Indian Removal Act? (Select all that apply.)
Vsevolod [243]

Answer:

The policy of the 'Indian Removal Act' had controversy in its application after agreement. This is because the issue is deemed an issue for the U.S. indigenous people. Many Indian tribes do not support this policy and try to counter and Cherokee one of them.

Explanation:

• Indian Removal Act

The' Indian Removal Act ' policy is one of U.S. President Andrew Jackson's racial policies. On May 28, 1830, this policy was signed. Five of the most important tribes are threatened as an outcome of this policy. Cherokee, Chickasaw, Choctaw, Creek, and Seminole are among these. This policy called for debate and was regarded in the United States to demean the Indians. Including Cherokee Indians who believe this policy to be unfair. Recalling that the Cherokee Indians played a quite wide part in the war against the British occupation in 1812.

• Cherokee in the United States

Cherokee is not an Indian tribe that could be underestimated. Cherokee gave the role of their land to the United States Government during the United States Revolution. With this land grant, the government promised Cherokee protection. The Cherokee Indians, however, were pushed out by the' Indian Removal Act' policy.

The policy harmed the Cherokee Indians by the U.S government to be moved to the Oklahoma area. The Cherokee Indians, however, remained resistant and opposed the policy. They attempted to reject the policy on the pretext of protecting their homeland from the oppressed white community. The Cherokee Indians endured a tragic destiny despite the battle and this tragedy became known as ' The Trail of Tears ' that claimed the lives of as many as 4,000 Cherokee people.

Learn More

If you’re interested learning more about this topic, we recomended you also take a look at the following question:

• How did the New England, Mid-Atlantic, Chesapeake, and Southern colonies develop differently? brainly.com/question/13165633

• Which of these was not a key difference between Northern and Southern states at the Constitutional Convention? brainly.com/question/13165577

Keyword: Indian Removal Act, Cherokee, US Government, American History

Subject: History

Class: 10-12

Sub-chapter:  American History

8 0
3 years ago
Which of the following statements best explains why many northern states did not use slaves? Select one: a. Northern states were
Rama09 [41]
C. People in northern states could simply not afford to own slaves. This was because they were poorer than the southern states.
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What did the Wilmot Proviso want to do with the land acquired from<br> Mexico?
MArishka [77]

Answer:

to eliminate slavery within the land

Explanation:

I hope this it buddy

3 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • What was John Locke idea of government?
    14·1 answer
  • 99 POINTS WILL MARK AS BRAINLIEST ANSWER ASAP PLEASE
    15·2 answers
  • Grant was able to gain control of the Mississippi River for the North at the Battle of ...
    5·2 answers
  • "DIVERSE GROUPS AND CLASSES PARTICIPATED IN THE FREEDOM MOVEMENTS WITH VARIED ASPIRATIONS" JUSTIFY THE STATEMENT.
    6·1 answer
  • What effect did Blackwell’s life and career have on other women
    13·1 answer
  • Carefully study the charts above. Which economic sector employs the least number of people in Mexico, Barbados, and Venezuela? A
    5·2 answers
  • ¿Qué ganaron los británicos con la guerra entre Francia e India?
    13·1 answer
  • The Nullification Act of 1832 declared that-
    5·1 answer
  • Was it necessary in 1787 to get rid of the Articles of Confederation and develop a new Constitution?
    7·2 answers
  • The first peace talks between the United States and North Vietnam during the Vietnam War began in the late 1970s. The early 1970
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!