Tevye's analogy is faulty in this situation because "Tevye's analogy is supporting the idea of marrying only Jews; however, it does not explain
the reason why this is supposed to happen".
<h3>How Tevye's analogy is different</h3>
Tevye's analogy is faulty in this situation because it doesn't give reasons to why one is supposed to "seek his own kind".
It is good to seek one's own kind so as to avoid the cultural problem in marriage. It helps to solve the problem of origin differences.
Culture is very important in any relationship. In order not to have different perspectives on an issue, it is ideal to go into relationships with people of the same culture.
Learn more about analogy:
brainly.com/question/13978016
Answer:
A
Direct characterization, or explicit characterization, describes the character through their physical description, line of work, or passions and pursuits. Indirect characterization describes a character through their thoughts, actions, speech, and dialogue
Because the adults are not the main characters in the story.
Answer:
Because the factor behind the illness was caused by the greed and thoughtlessness of the traders.
Explanation:
In his narrative book, "The Life of Olaudah Equiano" Equiano tells of his life in slavery.
When Equiano was boarded on the ship, he saw the poor conditions of the ship. The traders on the slave ships were 'improvident avarice'; all they thought about was their profits. <u>The illness abroad the ships were caused due to small spaces, suffocating atmosphere, unbearable smell, and lack of food. The traders, to get more pay for slaves, would overload their ships with slaves in the small space, they were thoughtless about the living conditions of the salves and did not provide them food</u>. But for Equiano, the traders were harming their ability by keeping slaves in unhealthy conditions. Because of this unhealthy conditions on the ships, slaves either died of illness or took their own lives.
