To find the displacement between t=0 and t=1, we want to plug 0 & 1 into the equations, then find the different in the answers.
<u>When t = 0:</u>
x = 4 cos(π(0)+π/4) → π · 0 = 0, so therefore:
x = 4 cos (π/4) → cos (π/4) = √2/2
x = 4 (√2/2)
x = 4√2/2 → 4 divided by 2 = 2, so we can simplify this to
x = 2√2
<u>When t = 1:</u>
x = 4 cos(π(1)+π/4) → π · 1 = π, so therefore:
x = 4 cos (π + π/4) → π + π/4 = 5π/4, so therefore
x = 4 cos (5π/4) → cosine of 5π/4 = -√2/2
x = 4 · -√2/2
x = -4√2/2 → -4 divided by 2 = -2, so we can simplify this to
x = -2√2
<u>Answer</u>: Then, we find the difference between x(0) and x(1), which is x(1)-x(0) =
-√2/2 - √2/2 = <u>-√2</u>
I think tropical rainforests I could be wrong
Answer:
The ethics of social consequences is a means of satisficing non-utilitarian consequentialism that can be used to approach disaster issues. The primary values in the ethics of social consequences are humanity, human dignity and moral rights, and these are developed and realized to achieve positive social consequences.Utilitarianism tells you to maximize utility; consequentialism, to maximize good consequences. In other words, a utilitarian who denies that what she should maximize, total utility, is identical to good consequences, is a non-consequentialist utilitarian. Such a utilitarian can be consistent.
