Answer:
C. In the appeal to pity argument, the advertisement appeals to emotion by showing animals in sad circumstances to support the claim that dogs need homes. In the personal attack, the statements focus attention on personal characteristics and draw conclusions about the candidate’s ability to serve the government based on her personal life.
Explanation:
This is the statement that best explains why both ads are examples of fallacies. In the first ad, we see an appeal to pity. The ad employs emotional appeals by showing animals in sad circumstances in order to convince the reader to adopt one. In the second ad, the argument is similarly fallacious, as the statement focuses on personal characteristics in order to support the idea that the candidate is not capable of holding public office.
Answer:
In my opinion, yes.
Explanation:
There is multiple things against Columbus and proof of horrible things he has done to indigenous people.
B.to buy Santiago and himself more time to find the treasure
Answer:
The language of “Midas’s Zinc Touch” is straightforward and helps the author achieve his purpose to inform readers about the true origins of the myth of Midas and his golden touch. The author chooses phrases such as “not true,” “none of that probably ever happened,” “we need to be more specific,” and “nothing more than an accidental ‘touch’ of zinc” to compare historical information to the myth. This use of straightforward diction helps the author show how the myth has historical origins but grew and embellished over time. In this way, the diction helps the author achieve his purpose to inform readers about his topic.
Explanation:
