1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
gregori [183]
3 years ago
9

When, in the 1770s, King George III arbitrarily vetoed laws passed by colonial legislatures, then dissolved those legislatures a

ltogether without the agreement of colonial citizens, he was removing which of the rights of the people listed below? Select one: A. not have soldiers quartered in their homes B. consent to be governed C. free speech D. have a trial by jury
History
1 answer:
Dafna11 [192]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

The colonists right to have a say in government was removed when their legislatures were dissolved, and by the ongoing lack of Parliamentary representation for the colonies.

You might be interested in
Each of the following is a disadvantage of using credit cards EXCEPT:
Ivahew [28]
D because interest free would be a good thing
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What is home rule?
noname [10]

Answer:

A home rule is the government of a colony, dependent country, or region by its own citizens.

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
How was the information passed down to each generation if they were not written down? In the Veda's (Indian Civlization)
Free_Kalibri [48]

Answer:  hmmm i have not learned this yet hold on....................................... sorry cant answer this one to hard

Explanation:

to hard

3 0
3 years ago
Hello I need help please the history is The Limits of Empathy. By David Brooks <br> 2011.
Phantasy [73]

Answer:

For #4, answer C. I'm not certain #3 can be answered with the text provided.

4 0
2 years ago
What might have happened if the National Government could only legislate based on what is specifically in the Constitution?
EastWind [94]
The amount of territory the US currently has would have been completely different if the national government could only legislate based on what is written in the constitution.

A perfect example of this is the power to purchase land/territories from other countries. This was first done by Thomas Jefferson with the Louisiana Purchase of 1803. The US Constitution does not say that the president has the power to buy land from other countries. However, Jefferson said that this power was "implied" by the Constitution.

This idea of an implied power greatly changed the presidency/national government. Several presidents after Jefferson would follow his lead by making deals with countries for territory.

If it wasn't for this concept of implied powers, the US may not have grown to the 50 states we know it as today.
8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which part of the constitution establishes the legislature branch of the government?
    6·1 answer
  • At the constitutional convention what was the name given to be the plan that took elements of both New Jersey and Virginia plans
    13·1 answer
  • How will young men be able to start fighting in World War 1?
    9·1 answer
  • HEY GUYS CAN YOU GUYS WRITE EVERYTHING YOU KNOW FROM THIS INFORMATION PLUS EVERYTHING YOU THINK THESE ARTIFACTS MEAN ABOUT THE C
    15·1 answer
  • The new approach to education established in Nazi Germany?
    14·1 answer
  • Please help me this is my final exam for history
    11·2 answers
  • The words "We the People" are the first words of what document?
    14·2 answers
  • Does the spoils system still exist today? Explain.
    13·2 answers
  • How did the medieval catholic church influence daily life?
    8·1 answer
  • Document e:Joseph coohill
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!