1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
gregori [183]
3 years ago
9

When, in the 1770s, King George III arbitrarily vetoed laws passed by colonial legislatures, then dissolved those legislatures a

ltogether without the agreement of colonial citizens, he was removing which of the rights of the people listed below? Select one: A. not have soldiers quartered in their homes B. consent to be governed C. free speech D. have a trial by jury
History
1 answer:
Dafna11 [192]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

The colonists right to have a say in government was removed when their legislatures were dissolved, and by the ongoing lack of Parliamentary representation for the colonies.

You might be interested in
How might a more comprehensive education and the expectation of rearing good citizens lead women to seek broader civic roles for
enyata [817]

Answer:

In its broadest definition, “civic education” means all the processes that ... That makes the question of good citizenship relative to the ... These questions are rarely treated together as part of comprehensive theories of civic education; ... of virtue, so would the polis itself become more virtuous and excellent.

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Today the world is heavily dependent on
Doss [256]

Answer:

i

Explanation:

dont know hahahahhahahah hindi ko po alam yubg sagot

6 0
3 years ago
Why were these "alliances" so important?
UkoKoshka [18]

Answer:

bc then everyone would fight

4 0
3 years ago
This Supreme Court case ruled that "separate but equal" was constitutional.
Kaylis [27]

Answer:

Plessy v. Ferguson

Explanation:

I hope this helps! Have a great day

7 0
3 years ago
Which is an example of a reason why historical interpretations may change over time<br><br>​
loris [4]

Answer:

Historians are always finding new pieces of evidence to change interpretations

Explanation:

If a historian were to find something on the Pyramids of Giza 10 years ago and made the assumption that "The Pyramids were built for people", a new piece of evidence recently found could change that, and see that "The Pyramids were built for gods"

(I don't know if this assumption about the Pyramids is true, I just thought of the first thing in mind)

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • According to Of Plymouth Plantation, which statement best describes the relationship between colonists and AmericanIndians?
    14·1 answer
  • Upon which British documents did the Founding Fathers base the new government of the United States? (This isn't multiple choice)
    13·2 answers
  • What are the four borders of egypt
    10·2 answers
  • Which of these is a plan that offered the constitution convention a proposal for representation?
    7·1 answer
  • In attempting to become financially organized, a person
    15·1 answer
  • The Munich Conference was an example of<br> before World War II.
    8·1 answer
  • How did the telescope contribute to Galileo's theories? a) Church elders could see the motion in the universe for themselves and
    11·1 answer
  • What does the author mean by including the figurative language, “But we are more than slaves to our feelings, circumstances and
    13·2 answers
  • ILL MARK AS BRAINLESS PLS HELP
    14·1 answer
  • A goal of the Border Ruffians during the time of "Bleeding Kansas" was to vote illegally for a/an
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!