In 1916, the supreme court ruled that it was constitutional to

2 answers:

5 0

The Keating-Owen Act , although it was passed by congress and signed into law by the president the Supreme Court ruled that it was not constitutional

Phoenix [80]3 years ago

3 0

Answer:Although the Keating-Owen Act was passed by Congress and signed into law by President Woodrow Wilson, the Supreme Court ruled that it was unconstitutional in Hammer v. Dagenhart 247 U.S. 251 (1918) because it overstepped the purpose of the government's powers to regulate interstate commerce.

Hope it helps :

You might be interested in

How did the Atlantic slave trade benefit the Africans?

inn [45]

It didn't really benefit them. It only benefited the people that sold slaves because they got money. The only other positive thing i can think of is if they took slaves from overpopulated areas.

5 0

3 years ago

During the American Revolution, why did many African-American slaves fight for the British and against the colonists?

Inessa05 [86]

During the American Revolution, many African-American slaves fought for the British against the colonists because <span>the "British guaranteed African-American slaves that they would be liberated if they fought on the side of the British during the Revolution</span>."

3 0

3 years ago

How did the Citizens United law reached the Supreme Court?

Andrei [34K]

Answer: On January 21, 2010, the court issued a 5–4 decision in favor of Citizens United that struck down the BCRA's restrictions on independent expenditures from corporate treasures as violations of the First Amendment.

Explanation:

3 0

3 years ago

_________ were primarily constructed for profit.

I am Lyosha [343]

Tumpikes is the answer

6 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

What is a warrior without a war

Andrews [41]

Answer:nothing at all just animal human

Explanation:

It makes sense

8 0

3 years ago