Between 3200 and 2350 B.C.E., they had evolved into city-states (the control of the surrounding region).
2. to allow more trade between countries
Yep, number 2 :D
<span>Tensions in the region started rising in 1863, when John Bozeman blazed the Bozeman Trail, a new route for emigrants traveling to the Montana gold fields. Bozeman’s trail was of questionable legality since it passed directly through hunting grounds that the government had promised to the Sioux, Cheyenne, and Arapahoe in the Fort Laramie Treaty of 1851. Thus when Colorado militiamen murdered more than two hundred peaceful Cheyenne during the Sand Creek Massacre of 1864, the Indians began to take revenge by attacking whites all across the Plains, including the emigrants traveling the Bozeman Trail. The U.S. government responded by building a series of protective forts along the trail; the largest and most important of these was Fort Phil Kearney, erected in 1866 in north-central Wyoming.</span>
Answer: (I've copy and pasted my old work of the independence)
All men are made equivalent and there are sure unalienable rights that legislatures ought to never disregard. These rights incorporate the privilege to life, freedom and the quest for satisfaction. At the point when an administration neglects to ensure those rights, it isn't just the right, yet additionally the obligation of individuals to oust that administration. In its place, individuals ought to set up an administration that is intended to secure those rights. Governments are once in a while toppled, and ought not be ousted for paltry reasons. For this situation, a long history of misuses has driven the pilgrims to oust an oppressive government.
The King of Great Britain, George III, is liable of 27 explicit maltreatments. The King meddled with the homesteaders' entitlement to self-government and for a reasonable legal framework. Acting with Parliament, the King additionally established enactment that influenced the states without their assent. This enactment required charges on the pioneers. It likewise expected them to quarter British troopers, taken out their entitlement to preliminary by jury, and kept them from exchanging openly. Moreover, the King and Parliament are liable of through and through demolition of American life and property by their refusal to secure the settlements' fringes, their seizure of American boats adrift, and their aim to enlist unfamiliar hired soldiers to battle against the pioneers.
-good enough??
