All categories

3 years ago

Information related to Riverbed Co. is presented below.

Business

1 answer:

Scrat [10]3 years ago

7 0

Answer:

April 5

Debit : Merchandise $36,000

Credit : Accounts Payable - Tamarisk Company $36,000

April 6

Debit : Accounts Payable - Tamarisk Company $920

Credit : Cash $920

April 7

Debit : Equipment $30,500

Credit : Accounts Payable $30,500

April 8

Debit : Accounts Payable - Tamarisk Company $4,200

Credit : Merchandise $4,200

April 15

Debit : Accounts Payable - Tamarisk Company $30,880

Credit : Discount received $926.40

Credit : Cash $29,954

Explanation:

Working for Journal on April 15

Balance = $36,000 - $920 - $4,200

= $30,880

Discount = $30,880 x 3%

= $926.40

Amount Paid = $30,880 - $926.40

= $29,954

You might be interested in

Organizations choose whether to:

Svetradugi [14.3K]

Answer:

Implementation

Explanation:

Organizations choose to implement new new system while old ones are still running, this is to upgrade their firms platforms for a better work environments.

Organizations tends to implement new information system, which are a major corporate asset, with respect both to the benefits they provide and to their high costa. Therefore, organizations have plan for the long term when acquiring information systems and services that will support business initiatives.

6 0

3 years ago

Anyone join if u want

LiRa [457]

Answer:

ok bet.

Explanation:

5 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

An example of an exclusive power is when _____. a local government collects taxes from a foreign business the united states sign

finlep [7]

Exclusive powers are the rights that ONLY that governing body has the ability to do.

A local government can collect taxes from a foreign business, but so can the federal and state governments.

The state cannot allows allow a business to operate in a city, if the city objects .

ONLY the US Federal Government can signs treaties with another country.

This is the only exclusive power in the choices listed.

3 0

3 years ago

Restrictive covenants... a. Were rendered unenforceable by Shelly v. Kraemer in 1948. b. Were rendered unenforceable by the the

Dmitriy789 [7]

Restrictive covenants "were rendered unenforceable by Shelly v. Kraemer in 1948."

This is evident by the Supreme Court decision in 1948 during the case of Shelly v. Kramer when the court ruled that the 14th Amendment prohibits the court from enforcing race discrimination in real estate contracts.

The 14th Amendment, which was ratified on July 9, 1868, stated that all the citizens of the United States have equal protection under the law.

Thus, no American citizens shall be deprived of life, liberty, or property by any state law.

Hence, in this case, it is concluded that the correct answer is option A. "were rendered unenforceable by Shelly v. Kraemer in 1948."

Learn more here: brainly.com/question/21345607

8 0

2 years ago

Maurice and Stanley's train store has grown to the point that they need more capital to expand the current location and to open

harina [27]

Answer:

b. sole proprietorship.

Explanation:

A sole proprietorship is a single business entity that is responsible for all profits and losses and may use a sole name or a business name as a private company is known for its flexibility and thus does not need to take large loans from the government.

Have an advantage of less administrative paperwork and record-keeping than a corporation, have less risk of being stolen by investors.

6 0

3 years ago