The correct answer to this question is Man versus society. This is the kind of conflict Marcus is facing. Man versus society is the type of conflict wherein the protagonist has a strong belief against the majority and then he decided to act upon it. This is common between a character and an outside group. Thank you for posting your question. I hope that this answer helped you. Let me know if you need more help.
Literary realism is a literary genre that depicts reality as it is in actual life by depicting banal, everyday occurrences. See more below.
<h3>What does literary realism show?</h3>
It typically depicts the middle and lower classes of society, with familiar people, places, and tales. The rejection of legendary entities is an example of realism.
<h3>What is Transcendentalism?</h3>
Transcendentalism depicts the idea of discovering the truth beyond experience and reason.
As a result, it is demonstrated that the truth can be established without the use of hard proof.
In terms of realism, it depicts a realistic picture of the real world in literature by disclosing ordinary situations.
Learn more about realism at:
brainly.com/question/796682
#SPJ2
Answer:
you did not underline any word
Explanation:
follow me
Answer: All right, here goes nothing. *cracks knuckles*
To begin with, the article has a weak claim. While it does vaguely introduce their stance on the topic, it poses it as a question and not a statement. Also, this claim is written in the first person, unlike strong claims that are supposed to be written in the third person. As for the "support" section, even the very beginning strays from the original claim, instead saying why <em>they </em>should own a pet instead of why <em>everyone</em> should be allowed to own pets. For example, in the second paragraph, the author cites a story from a friend of a friend. That is not valid evidence. If it was on the news, however, and the author cited that as evidence instead, the article would be much stronger. The author also delves deeper into their own personal life instead of stating facts as they should have. The transition between paragraphs is clunky at best, with the third paragraph pretty much restating the claim instead of simply saying something like "Pets are helpful to our society." And finally, the entire purpose of that last sentence seems to be to wrap up the article in a hasty fashion, without any attention to restating the claim or the facts presented.
Hope this meets the criteria! Good luck!!
