She didn't wind up plainly resistant to streptococcal contaminations after the primary episode since when she initially got it, she may have become a few episodes of strep throat, her living condition may at present have streptococcal, it could likewise be that her own particular uncle was tainted and contaminated to Fredrica again by embracing her, and she didn't take every one of the solutions. She can get tainted once more; a few people can get contaminated 6 clocks for each year.
Answer: 27%
Explanation:
The Average rate of return is calculated by;
= Estimated Average Annual income / Average Investment
Estimated Average annual income = Total income/ years income is accrued
= 402,300/5
= $80,460
Average Investment = (Initial cost + Residual value) / 2
= (524,500 + 71,500) / 2
= $298,000
Average rate of return = 80,460/298,000
= 0.27
= 27%
Answer:
(B) I and III
Explanation:
The variable annuity contract allows the investor tho make monthly payment for retirement in two pahses. First it will accumulate on his accounts by mading monthly deposits to yield a return on the fund, stocks or bonds. Then, the investor at retirement age enter the second phase. At which receives payouts from his deposists and earnings.
Therefore, the owner caccounts fluctuate during accumulation period as is ncreaseing or decreasing based on the investment made.
Finally, like all contract is subject to federal and state authority.
Leadership is a way of leading others towards a certain goal. The one in charge of the leading or steering the mantle of leadership is known as a leader.
<h3>Characteristics of Transformational leadership</h3>
Transformational leadership helps followers to transcend their own self-interests for the good of the group.
There are types of leaders in every context. There are good and bad leaders. A transfirmational leader helps followers to achieve their personal interests.
learn more about leadership from here: brainly.com/question/12522775
Answer: False
Explanation: It is lawful to take an action against employers because employees must have complained about discrimination that affects other people. It does not matter whether the person is a witness regarding an EEO complaint brought by others, or whether the person is complaining of conduct that directly affects himself.
