Answer:
0.4766
Explanation:
Given:
WACC = 9.7%
Company’s cost of equity = 12%
Pretax cost of debt = 7.5%
Tax rate = 35%
Now,
WACC
= Weight × Cost of equity + (1 - weight) × Pretax cost of debt × (1-tax rate)
or
0.097 = weight × 0.12 + ( 1 - weight ) × 0.075 × (1 - 0.35)
or
0.097 = 0.12 × weight + 0.04875 - 0.04875 × weight
or
0.04825 = 0.07125 × weight
or
weight = 0.6772
also,
weight =
or
=
or
=
+ 1
or
1.4766 =
+ 1
or
= 0.4766
Answer:
my baby daddy.
Explanation:
I forgot to take the pill :(
Answer:
B. False
Explanation:
Flotation costs are cost that are concerned with issuing new common stock. It is the amount of money or cost incurred by an organization when offering its securities to the public. The cost may include legal fees, auditing fees and registration fees. When the flotation cost goes higher, firms are more likely to use debts rather than preferred stock. This is simply because debt is lesser than both common stock and preferred stock. Also, its fallacy to think that preferred stock doesnt have flotation cost. Its only that its not as high as the ones for new common equity.
Answer: GNP; GDP
Explanation:
<em>The value of what a Canadian-owned Tim Hortons produces in South Korea is included in the Canadian </em><em><u>GNP </u></em><em>and the South Korean </em><em><u>GDP</u></em><em>. </em>
Gross National Product refers to the total amount of domestic production and foreign production that can be attributed to the residents of a nation.
This means that GNP includes the GDP and income earned by residents of the country in other countries but less the income earned by foreigners in the country. For Canada therefore, the value of goods produced by the Canadian company in South Korea will be added to the GNP.
Gross Domestic Product (GDP) on the other hand is simply the total final value of goods and services produced in a country regardless of if it was foreigners or residents doing the production. The value of what a Canadian-owned Tim Hortons produces in South Korea is therefore included in South Korea's GDP.
Answer: c. Individuals who study music tend to be more intelligent.
Explanation:
The underlying assumption of the argument above is that the individuals who study music tend to be more intelligent.
This can be infered in the statement that "Generally, individuals that study music achieve more exceptional scores in subjects such as math and language arts". In this case, a connection was emphasized between academics and music.