Answer:
The arguments for imperialism included the US and Europe's desire to find new sources of raw materials, establish new markets for trade, spread Christianity and Western ideas, and create strategic military bases. The arguments against imperialism included the idea that imperialism was un-American and a fear of immigration to the US from colonized areas.
<span>They would be motivated by the promise of safety. They would have formed alliances with the British during the colonial war for independence if they knew that they people would not be harmed or killed by the british. They would also have been motivated by resources such as weapons, food, and tools. Their alliance could have been mutually beneficial.</span>
Answer:
I am really sorry but i can't answer
Ummmmmmmmmmmm.........sry can not help you there
This speech is a primary source.
It is a primary source because it is a fragment from the event that was happening at that moment and because it is a direct expression of a figure that was active in such an event, i.e., women's movement.
The other questions are wrong because: there isn't such thing as a neutral source; a secondary source is a work of history produced by a historian that studied primary sources and analyzed them; as for unreliable, no source is completely reliable nor completely unreliable -- it always depends on what we are asking of it.
