Go here for more info about Macroeconomics:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Macroeconomics<span>
Macroeconomics (from the Greek prefix makro- meaning "large" and economics) is a branch of economics dealing with the performance, structure, behavior, and decision-making of an economy as a whole. This includes national, regional, and global economies.</span>
The ratification of the U.S Constitution is the correct answer.
Even though the 'Articles of Confederation and Perpetual Union' had been submitted for ratification in 1777, it wasn't until 1781 that a significant number of states approved it. The ratification of the U.S constitution was a very important event in the midst of the economic depression that the United States was going through.
Hello There!
I do believe that learning that the past is important. To understand the present "current events" we must have an understanding of what has already taken place in the past. Some examples of this would be "Conflicts with other countries" "Economy" or "Treatment of immigrants" Also, past events and experiences have shaped our identity and who we are as a country. We need to be aware of our surroundings and realize that we got here because our ancestors helped us through generations. Another thing it helps us do is understand change and how the society we live in today came to be. And lastly, its essential to study history to be a global citizen
Answer:
The old regime was the social and political system of France in which people were separated into three social classes also known as the estates. ... The 1st estate owned 10% of the land in France and contributed 2% of their income towards the government. 2nd Estate
Answer:
1. The author uses the words "undefined", "unbounded" and "immense" to describe the powers of the constitution.
2. Upset: it makes the Congress even more powerful than it’s previous long list of expressed powers
3. A Bill of Rights is necessary to protect the rights of citizens. The proposed Constitution does not do enough.
4. Yes he does, and it matters because if you don’t trust the people in power you wouldn’t have a real nation.
5.He seems more like an Anti-Federalist.
Part Two
1. Unnecessary and dangerous
2. From the Federalist No.84
3. No because he believes that its unnecessary and not needed in the constitution.
4. That the bill of rights is pointless and not realistic for the American people.
5 He is defiantly Anti-Federalist; He goes against everything Federalism is for.
