Simile, if this is an option.
If not, then please provide the options :)
Susan B. Anthony states that the founding documents confer rights on all people, including women, and therefore women are entitled to vote and she also states that women who are born in the United States are automatically considered citizens and therefore have the right to vote. These are the two arguments that she uses.
Susan B. Anthony was always committed to the women's suffrage movement since she considered the disfranchisement of women an injustice. On her speech, "On Women's Right to Vote" (1873), Susan B. Anthony, a famous women's rights activist, refers to the Constitution (1787), the supreme law of the United States and a power that no state can deny that establishes that all United States citizens, including women and men, are entitled to vote, in order to support her argument that women also have the right to vote. Furthermore, Susan B. Anthony argues that, by being persons, women are also citizens and that the disfranchisement of women that have been born in the United States goes against what Webster, Worcester and Bouvier, famous lexicographers, define as 'citizen' and what has been established in the Constitution, a violation which makes the government antidemocratic.
Anthony had an important role in the women's suffrage movement in a time when white men that governed the country discriminated different minorities, including women and black men.
The term old-fashioned describes the overall tone of the passage.
<h3>What tone of a passage?</h3>
An expression of the attitude made by the writer or the author in a literary composition, which conveys feelings or environment, is known as tone of a passage.
Hence, option D holds true regarding tone of the passage.
Learn more tone of passage here:
brainly.com/question/17098262
#SPJ1
Answer:
Refer below.
Explanation:
The creator does exclude an area investigating counterarguments or an end.
In spite of the fact that there are numerous outstanding instances of fruitful journalists who were known—in any event to a limited extent—for their lethargy, instances of individuals who were effective as an immediate consequence of their tirelessness possess large amounts of a wide scope of controls. Michael Jordan, for instance, is broadly viewed as one of the best ball players ever. During his profession, he was known for his tenacious seriousness and scrupulousness. Among writers, Ray Bradbury was known for keeping in touch with one short story consistently—a shocking pace of creation. What's more, numerous other fruitful creators have set page amounts and severe timetables for themselves. Along these lines, while downgrading profitability may have worked for a few, concentrating eagerly on it has worked for some others.
I discover my counterargument genuinely compelling. The creator's contention fundamentally comprises of narrative proof. It would be compelling if the entirety of the accessible proof bolstered the focal case. However, the measure of narrative proof that doesn't bolster the case debilitates the creator's contention and reinforces my counterarguement.
Answer:
Can help alice in her quest
Explanation:
