They are unrelated. Present day traditionalists are attached to guaranteeing that the Second Amendment was made so the nationals could oppose oppression and help battle to protect the Constitution, including the First Amendment. It wasn't. This is revisionist history. It was made to keep Congress and Congress alone from restricting the privilege to remain battle ready, which would keep the states from setting up local armies utilizing residents' weapons.
Actually, the states dependably had the ability to direct guns any way they needed, in light of the fact that at first, the Second Amendment didn't make a difference to them by any means. They likewise had the ability to confine discourse and the press et cetera, on the grounds that the First Amendment didn't have any significant bearing to them either.
The United Nations is the organization!
To promote assimilation, American Indian children were given free education and were inducted into federally funded boarding schools across the country.
Policy makers at the time hoped that the early immersion of native born children would help them become "proper" and productive citizens. One of the first boarding schools was the Carlisle Indian School, established in 1879 on Pennsylvania
The founder, Henry Pratt, believed that education was key in order to "kill the Indian and save the man." The theory of the boarding school became known as "assimilation through education."
Lincoln ran on a political platform opposed to the expansion of slavery in the territories. His election served as the immediate impetus for the outbreak of the Civil War.
