All categories

3 years ago

What is 2 divided by 6

Mathematics

2 answers:

Svetradugi [14.3K]3 years ago

6 0

Answer:

0.33333333333333

Step-by-step explanation:

Doesn't ever end

GarryVolchara [31]3 years ago

4 0

Answer:

2.333 repeating

Step-by-step explanation:

you divide 2 by 6 (srry i neede more characters)

you can do the repeat symbol by placing a slash over top of the 3rd 3

You might be interested in

A pilot is flying a CRJ-900 from Phoenix, Arizona, to Louisville, Kentucky. The aircraft cannot take off or land if the temperat

ioda

We need to find an inequality that represents the possible landing or take of conditions of an aircraft, the required graph and one case where the inequality will be tested.

The required inequality is $-40$ .

The graph represents the allowable temperature range in which the aircraft can takeoff or land.

The pilot could not have taken off on June 1990, the temperature in Phoenix, Arizona.

Let the temperature be denoted by $x$

The temperature cannot be at or below $-40^{\circ}\text{F}$ , so

$x>-40$

The temperature cannot be at or above $118^{\circ}\text{F}$ , so

$x$

The inequality will be $-40$ .

In the graph it can be seen that all points between -40 and 118 falls in the shaded region but it will exclude the points -40 and 118.

The graph represents the allowable temperature range in which the aircraft can takeoff or land.

The temperature in June 1990 in Phoenix, Arizona was $122^{\circ}$ which is more than $118^{\circ}\text{F}$ .

Hence, the pilot could not have taken off on this day.

Learn more:

brainly.com/question/20383699

brainly.com/question/11612965

4 0

2 years ago

Fiona invested $1000 at 7% compounded continuously. At the same time, Maria invested $1100 at 7% compounded daily. How long will

Natali [406]

9514 1404 393

Answer:

14,201 years

Step-by-step explanation:

The two compound interest formulas are ...

A = P·e^(rt) . . . . . continuous compounding at rate r for t years

A = P·(1 +r/365)^(365t) . . . . . daily compounding at rate r for t years

We went the amounts to be equal:

1000·e^(0.07t) = 1100·(1+0.07/365)^(365t)

Dividing by 1000(1 +0.07/365)^(365t), we have ...

((e^0.07)/(1+0.07/365)^365)^t = 1.1

The base of the exponential on the left is ...

( e^0.07)/(1+0.07/365)^365 ≈ 1.00000671149321522

Taking logs, we have ...

t×ln(1.00000671149321522) = ln(1.1)

t = ln(1.1)/ln(1.00000671149321522) ≈ 0.09531018/(6.7114704·10^-6)

t ≈ 14,201.09 . . . . . years

It will take about 14,201 years for the investments to be equal.

_____

Additional comment

The investment value at that time will be about $5.269·10^434. (That's a larger number than anything countable in the known universe, including energy quanta.)

These calculations are beyond the ability of many calculators, so might need to be carefully rewritten if the calculator only keeps 10 significant digits, or only manages exponents less than 100.

This shows that daily compounding is very close in effect to continuous compounding. It would take almost 150 years to make a difference of 0.1% in value.

4 0

3 years ago

"If the probability of an event is observed repeatedly during independent repetitions than the ratio of the observed to the tota

PIT_PIT [208]

Answer:

This is the Law of large Numbers.

Step-by-step explanation:

The Law of Large numbers states that as the sample size is increased the sample mean value gets closer to the population mean.

That is, as n → ∞ the value of $\bar x$ → μ.

For instance, the theoretical probability of getting a Heads in a toss of a coin is, 0.50.

To check this perform an experiment whether the coin is tossed 20 times.

The probability of heads will be somewhere near 0.50.

Now toss the coins 50 times.

The probability of heads will be now closer to 0.50.

Now toss the coins 100 times.

The probability of heads will be approximately equal to 0.50.

Thus, as the number of tosses was increased the probability of getting a head is closer tot he theoretical probability.

Thus, the complete statement is:

This is the Law of large Numbers.

3 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Consider the limit of rational function p(x)l q(x)

Helga [31]

$\\ \sf\bull\dashrightarrow {\displaystyle{\lim_{x\to c}}}\dfrac{p(x)}{q(x)}=\dfrac{0}{1}=0$

The limit tends to 0
Hence c=0

$\\ \sf\bull\dashrightarrow {\displaystyle{\lim_{x\to c}}}\dfrac{p(x)}{q(x)}=\dfrac{1}{1}=1$

Here limit tends to 1
Hence c=1

$\\ \sf\bull\dashrightarrow {\displaystyle{\lim_{x\to 0}}}\dfrac{p(x)}{q(x)}=\dfrac{1}{0}=\infty$

Here x tends to infty.
c=infty

For the fourth one limit also tends to zero

8 0

3 years ago

PLEASE HELP! I need someone to help me with my home work is anyone able to help?

Monica [59]

Answer:

Katie

Step-by-step explanation:

Use seconds as the standard unit to compare the speeds of the 4 runners

Tony is already in standard form and runs 12 ft/s

Katie:

450/30

15 ft/s

Frank:

1 mile = 5280 feet

5280/577

9.15 ft/s

Adam:

I minute = 60 seconds

880/60

14.67 ft/s

8 0

3 years ago