1. The writer is conveying the message to the reader, so by writing as if she was talking to you helps to add emphasis to the story she is telling. It brings more attention to herself, as she is addressing the audience.
2. I think this poem would appeal to people who have moved to a new country and could relate to the experience of changing one's accent, for example, an American moving to London ,or an Australian moving to America. They would be able to relate to the poem, and therefore find it more enjoyable.
3. The poem has a more serious tone, as the writer is telling about the experience they had losing a part of their past. It convey's the serious regret the writer has about losing their accent, and their desire to return it. There is, however, humour laced withing the lines, to make the poem easier to read.
I hope that helped!
Answer:
Which sentence is the topic sentence? 3
Which sentence is the concluding sentence? 4
Which sentence does not support the topic of the paragraph? 7
Explanation:
It's very simple to understand, The conclusion sentence should either restate the topic sentence or just wrap everything up. It makes the most sense that the topic sentence is 3 because it's a generic sentence, whereas the other sentences are supporting details. If the topic of the paragraph is 3, 7 is the sentence that does not support that topic.
Sorry if any of these are wrong!
The answer is me. Would you like Fred and me to leave for lunch now? Because if you were to say this without Fred you would say, "Would you like me to leave for lunch now" rather than, "Would you like myself to leave for lunch now". So your correct answer is me. Saying myself sounds awkward and is not the correct terminology for this phrase.
I hope this helps!
Im not positive but im pretty sure the answer is D.
Good luck!
Answer:
Because it is keeping you on the edge, and the reader wants to keep reading to understand and figure out the mystery. Hope this helps.
Explanation: