Answer:
$50.57 ; $175,573.6
Explanation:
The computation of the fixed and variable portions of overhead costs based on machine-hours using high low method is shown below:
Variable cost per hour = (High Overhead cost - low overhead cost) ÷ (High machine hours - low service hours)
= ($581,145 - $503,775) ÷ (8,020 hours - 6,490 hours)
= $77,370 ÷ 1,530 hours
= $50.57
Now the fixed cost equal to
= High overhead cost - (High machine hours × Variable cost per hour)
= $581,145 - (8,020 hours × $50.57)
= $581,145 - $405,571.4
= $175,573.60
Answer:
The discount will not affect the net income as no gain is recognize nor expense.
the cash flow statemetn will decrease by 3,960 which is the cash used.
the balance sheet after the series of trasnactions, will show inventory for 3,960
Cash would have decrease by 3,960
No change on equity.
Explanation:
inventory 5,000 debit
accounts payable 5,000 credit
account payable 1,000 debit
inventory 1,000 credit
Account payable 4,000 debit
Inventory 40 credit
Cash 3,960 credit
Answer:
The price elasticity of demand for home heating oil is-0.36
Explanation:
In order to calculate the price elasticity of demand for home heating oil we would have to use the following formula:
Elasticity of demand = (dQ/dPhho)*(P/Q)
According to the given data we have the following:
demand for home heating oil in Connecticut=Q = 20 – 2 Phho + 0.5 Png – TEMP
current price of home heating oil=$1.20
current price of natural gas =$2.0
Therefore, if Q = 20 – 2 Phho + 0.5 Png – TEMP, then:
Q=20 – 2*1.2 + .5*2 – 12
Q=6.6
Therefore, price elasticity of demand = (-2)*(1.2/6.6)
price elasticity of demand =-0.36
The price elasticity of demand for home heating oil is-0.36
Answer:
Option B and C
Explanation:
A query can be run by selecting query option visible through deign view option. After selecting the appropriate option, the query must be run. This shall execute the function for the selected option.
Like wise in data sheet view, one can see the action query before running it.
Hence, option B and C are correct
Answer:
No they should not be held accountable.
Explanation:
When the actions were taken in the past it was legal, now that it is illegal the companies should not be held accountable. If they are it will set a bad precedent that will affect a lot of companies.
In the case of GE that did experiments on prisoners to test effects of irradiation however, even if criminal charges are not brought against them, they can face charges. What they did was wrong even if it was legal then.
