
(Notice that we always have
and
, then solve for
:




(this is the inverse)
###
This inverse is valid only for
. Why?
Suppose we take
. Then

This would suggest that in the original equation, we should get
when
. But when we check this, we end up with

which is clearly not true.
Answer: The answer is B, 6 1/2
Step-by-step explanation:
6+5= 11
1/2+1/2= 1
11+1= 12
12-3=9
Answer:
Hey there!
2/3 of 90 cm would be 60 cm.
Hope this helps :)
Answer:
- x - 5y = -5; x -5y = 35
- there are no solutions, the lines are parallel so do not intersect
Step-by-step explanation:
<h3>1.</h3>
We judge the x-intercept to be about 5 times as far from the origin as the y-intercept is. If we take the y-intercept of the blue line to be +1, then the equation of that line can be x -5y = -5. The y-intercept of the black line appears to be about 7 times as far from the origin as for the blue line, so the constant will be multiplied by -7: x -5y = 35.
The two equations in the system of equations could be ...
__
<h3>2.</h3>
We have assumed the two lines are parallel, so they will not intersect. A point of intersection would be a solution to the system. The system of equations will have no solutions.