<span><span>The Safavid and Ottoman dynasties were both of Turkish ethnicity. The Safavid empire extended from the Caucasia ( Armenia, Azeribijan, etc.) to India, Iraq, the Persian Gulf, and parts of central Asia and the Caspian Sea.The Ottoman empire, on the other hand, ruled the the rest of the Islamic empire (Middle East, Balkans, and North Africa).
The Ottoman empire was older and stronger than the young Safavid empire, but the Ottomans were alarmed as the Safavid strength and influence grew and felt their interest was threatened. Moreover, the Safavid followed Shia Islam, while the Ottoman people were followers of Sunni/Sufi Islam.
But the main reasons for the conflict are rather political than for sectarian religious factors as many try to force this idea of Sunni/Shia conflict.
As the Safavid empire grew, it pushed its territories as far as Iraq and eastern Turkey, carving for itself a considerable chunk of Ottoman territory. This was the point when the Ottomans felt in danger and waged war on their cousins the Safavid.</span><span>
</span></span>
D. because the treaty had nothing to do with africans, neither independent nations in the west, and not all the alliances were in Europe
Answer:
Venustiano Carranza
Explanation:
On April 10, 1919, Emiliano Zapata was assassinated by agents of Venustiano Carranza, Mexico's president and an opponent of Zapata's land reform agenda
I believe that it is C
When a class economy is spending money they are boosting our financial system
Their finest hour actually referred to RAF pilots who managed to repel the invading Nazis from occupying Britain
