Answer:
Definitional, uncontroversially true
Explanation:
Answer:
A. A business letter provides a record of the contact with all of the details.
Question: Which of the following is true about functional text?
Options:
- A) Good readers use textual features such as titles, headings, different font sizes, and graphics to read and understand functional text.
- B) Good readers avoid varying their reading strategies as they approach functional texts.
- C) Good readers focus on the words in functional text, and they overlook how those words are presented on the page.
- D) Good readers know to save time when reading functional text by ignoring pictures and graphs that can distract them.
Answer: The correct answer is option: <u>A) Good readers use textual features such as titles, headings, different font sizes, and graphics to read and understand functional text.</u>
Explanation: Functional text is used for everyday information. Its objective is to help people function in your day-to-day life. Functional texts use graphics, different font sizes and other textual features in order to engage the readers and guide them by using instructional information. Good readers use the textual features in functional texts in order to read and understand the information.
Answer:
<u>Claim:</u> the voting age should be lowered to 16 years old.
<u>Opposing claim:</u> some people are against it because they believe that 16 years olds can not make informed decisions and are going to vote according to whim or how their parents tell them to vote.
<u>Counterclaim:</u> lowering the voting age is more likely to produce a better-informed body of voters since school can help them with courses for such thing.
Explanation:
The claim in this text is that the voting age should be lowered since young people deserve to have a say in the direction of the country. Some of the reasons supporting this claim are that 16-year-olds are mature enough for this decision in contrast with teenagers of previous generations as shown in studies. Also, they are more informed and competent than adults.
The opposing claim states that 16 years olds are not well informed, and they will vote according to what their parents tell them to vote or without consciousness. There are no investigations in the article that support the opposing claim.
The counterclaim says that as 16-year-olds are still in school, the education system can develop instruction courses to teach them about the candidates. As they have the right to vote, students will be motivated to learn about this topic.