<span>Assuming that this is referring to the same list of options that was posted before with this question, <span>the correct response would be "bias", since this implies that the author is not speaking from a place of objectivity, but instead is trying to pursue an "agenda".</span></span>
<span>President Truman decided to use the bomb for many reasons. Having not knowledge about the existence of the bomb until his presidency, he saw it as a new weapon developed by the US and that should be used for that purpose. Secondly, Truman wanted to avoid an invasion of Japan because it would be extremely costly, difficult, and simply horrible. It also meant the loss of many more American lives since the Japanese attacks were so brutal. Truman hoped that the use of the bomb would and it's astonishing effects would be enough for Japan to surrender and they would not have to invade them. Lastly, Truman wanted to use it to show the soviets of it's power for post world war II policies. I personally believe that Truman did the right thing. It was evident in all the battles in the pacific that Japan was extremely stubborn and would do anything but admit defeat. Just taking over the underpopulated islands on the way to Japan was very difficult because of the Japanese's tireless efforts. I think that the only way to make them surrender was to scare them into a surrender. The back and forth combat wasn't completely useless but exhausting and would make the war last longer than needed.The Japanese were so focused on fighting and trying to harm us, that they trained their soldiers to die in the desperate kamikaze attacks. I really don't think that invading their homeland would lead to a surrender or end to the war. Not only would they not surrender, but many american lives would be lost in the process unnecessarily. The bomb was ready, and functional.</span>
Namibia and Poland have encountered relatively high rates in 2006 because of there economic policies. Poland and Namibia have growth rate of 3.3 and 4.2 respectively.
Answer:
Here are different water conservation methods where major savings can be done, without many hasseles:
Rainwater harvesting.
Water metering.
Greywater recycling.
Pressure-reducing valves.
Water-efficient bathroom accessories.
Explanation:
