Answer:
No, unless you saw him with your own eyes, he repeated the conversation, or he said something to you, you would have no proof he had done so
Explanation:
I hope this helps
The sentences that follow the question are these:
1. According to Paine, the government of Great Britain will bequeath ................. to the colonists.
2. The author also implies that the posterity .................................
The complete statements are as follows:
1. According to Paine, the government of Great Britain will bequeath NOTHING THAT WILL ENDURE to the colonists.
Literally, to bequeath something means to leave a personal belong to another person by mean of will. In the excerpt given above, the author is saying that the Great Britain does not have any long lasting value to offer America and this implies that the present generation of America in turn will have nothing to offer the coming generations.
2. The author also implies that the posterity OF ANY NATION HAS THE RIGHT TO BLAME THEIR PREDECESSORS FOR THEIR SUFFERING.
Posterity refers to future generation of a particular person or nation.
From the excerpt given above it can be seen that the author believes that the present day America generation has the responsibility to fight for their coming generations in order to leave a worth inheritance to them, for that is the responsibility of all parents.
The problem with using the sentence "I agree with Mr. Jones's contention that the government is not meeting the healthcare needs of the middle-class American" in a research paper is, it uses first person point of view.
Answer: Option B.
Explanation:
Research paper is a type of academic writing where a person analyses, and interprets the information bases on the original work. Such type of writing often discourage the use of first person point of view.
In the sentence, I’ agree with Mr. Jones's contention that the government is not meeting the healthcare needs of the middle-class American’, ‘I’ represents the first person pronoun. Such sentences cannot be used in research paper because it may result in personal bias and might also sound opinionated.
Answer: A strict lockdown is better because it can control the virus so much better and the restrictions can end faster. A Smart lockdown can be comfortable for us because many things are open, it also means we will have longer lockdowns with more cases.
