Answer:
integration.
Explanation:
Just trust me on this one i got it-
Railroads helped the nations economy grow tremendously. It changed the entire Industrial revolution and made it more easier.
Rail roads helped the economy grow by:
-Transporting goods
-Use of transportation to and from places
-Rise the demand for materials
______________________________________________________
Explanations:
The reason why rail roads helped the U.S economy was by transporting goods. Trains could carry tons of things in it and in a easily fashion, which made it easier to get things around. Trains helped businesses gets supplies around and made it less complicated. If there were no trains, the industry's during that time would be in a struggle because it would be complicated to transport things throughout the country.
Another reason why rail roads helped the U.S economy was by making it a reliable source of transportation. Before trains were invented, people used horses to travel from place to place, and that takes a very long time and is very exhausting. Trains solved the problem of transportation. Trains could carry many passengers and could take them to a certain destination as quickly as possible, while being safe.
Another reason why rail roads helped the U.S economy was by making the demands for certain materials rise. Materials like steel and wood were in very high demand because people needed a lot of quantities of steel and wood to make the rail road tracks. People sold wood and steel for a high price, which helped the economy a lot.
Answer:
A. State laws can ensure fair access for voters to registration and polling places
Explanation:
It is Option A. because when State laws ensure fair access for voters to registration and polling places, every eligible voters or electorates will be given adequate chance and opportunity to vote whoever they believe will represent their interest without biases to another candidate or party. Hence, the right answer is Option A.
It is not option B, because when State laws prohibit political speech if it is considered controversial, that equates to suppression of FREEDOM OF SPEECH, which will eventually results to campaigns being restricted. Thus, this action by the State will not support a fair election process.
It is not Option C. because when State laws restrict voting if the government has a good reason, then some electorates will be disenfranchised, and the election result, will not show the true reflection of the people's will. Thus, this action by the state will not support a fair election process.
It is not Option D. because when State laws benefit some people and hurt others to keep an election fair, those the laws hurt, will be disenfranchised, and that will show biases from the government towards a particular candidate or party over others. Thus, this action by the state will not support a fair election process.
