Answer:
Political factions or parties began to form during the struggle over ratification of the federal Constitution of 1787. Friction between them increased as attention shifted from the creation of a new federal government to the question of how powerful that federal government would be.
Answer:
The provisions of the Missouri Compromise forbidding slavery in the former Louisiana Territory north of the parallel 36°30′ north were effectively repealed by Stephen A. Douglas's Kansas–Nebraska Act of 1854.
Answer:
Explanation:
A) Bush V. Gore was about a presidential election dispute.
B) Gideon V. Wainwright was about not being able to afford someone to represent you.
C) Miranda V. Arizona enforced the Miranda Rights.
D) United States V. Nixon was about the affair in which they ordered tape recordings to be used in court.
None of these seem correct to the answer as Marbury v. Madison seems a much better choice. If I had to chose, I'd probably choose B or C.
Answer:
This allowed the chiefs to not meet and form alliances against him. Meanwhile, he continued to invade the desired territories.
Explanation:
by separating the properties of the Chiefs, Kamehameha prevented them from uniting, forming alliances and managing to prevent him from achieving his goals. This was an insightful strategy, which managed in an exemplary way to reduce the risks of defeat for Kamehameha, in addition to stimulating his advance within the desired territories.
