Answer:
If you were writing it as a proper noun, yes.
Explanation:
If you wrote 'I admired the Appalachian Mountains on Tuesday,' then yes. If you wrote 'I like to look at Mountains,' then no.
To fix the sentence, change "," after 2004 to ";" and remove the "and" before scientists. It makes the sentence sound better.
I hope that helps!
Hi!
The correct options would be Direct Quotations and Paraphrasing.
Textual evidence refers to those lines or statements that substantiate a claim. In our case, while analyzing a literary piece, we can incorporate direct quotations, or paraphrase particular lines from the essay that support our argument or opinion.
Direct quotations are lines cited unaltered directly from the essay, and are incorporated between quotation marks. This is the most effective form of textual evidence.
Paraphrasing entails that the same idea, fact or message conveyed by the author in the essay are mentioned in the analysis in one's own words.
The thesis statement is clearly defines the topic of the analysis and all the textual evidence must be presented in a way to support it. It, itself, cannot be textual evidence.
The summary of the plot would be the brief account of the essay, and may not necessarily be as effective in proving a claim, and does not qualify as effective textual evidence when analyzing a literary essay.
Similarly the biography of the author may or may not relate to the literary essay, and is hardly used as textual evidence.
Hope this helps.
Answer:
Third person uses pronouns he, she, his, her, etc. First person uses I and me.
I hope that helps you
Answer:
Therefore
Explanation:
When inputting all of the options into the sentence, this is the only response that had made logical sense to me.
