I think the correct answer is possessives
Answer:
False
Explanation:
Oedipus begs him to reveal who Laius’s murderer is, but Tiresias answers only that he knows the truth but wishes he did not. Puzzled at first, then angry, Oedipus insists that Tiresias tell Thebes what he knows. Provoked by the anger and insults of Oedipus, Tiresias begins to hint at his knowledge. Finally, when Oedipus furiously accuses Tiresias of the murder, Tiresias tells Oedipus that Oedipus himself is the curse. Oedipus dares Tiresias to say it again, and so Tiresias calls Oedipus the murderer. The king criticizes Tiresias’s powers wildly and insults his blindness, but Tiresias only responds that the insults will eventually be turned on Oedipus by all of Thebes. Driven into a fury by the accusation, Oedipus proceeds to concoct a story that Creon and Tiresias are conspiring to overthrow him.
(i beleve false is right, if not sorry if it is then yay)
I believe A, hope I could help
At the end of the poem, hope is lost too soon, before the time is right.
We can reach this conclusion because:
- The poem is a great analogy about communism's invasion of Vietnam.
- In the poem, hope is represented by the papaya, which is not ripe enough to be picked.
- Some people want to cut the papaya, even before the right time, to prevent the communists from taking it.
- However, others feel that papaya should be cut when it is fully ripe, as everyone deserves it, including children.
- However, the papaya is cut early in a sad and melancholy way, as it is not ready to be eaten.
In that case, we can conclude that just like the papaya in the poem, some people cut hope out of their hearts very quickly towards the fight against communism and ended up leaving Vietnam too soon, before the right time, which was a sad and melancholic situation.
More information:
brainly.com/question/24742609?referrer=searchResults
