Answer:
A reduction in rainfall and a dramatic water shortage would be a very difficult event for any region. In this situation, the responses would have to be institutional, social and individual.
Explanation
The institutional response is the responsability of the government. The government would have to look for new water sources, but it would also have to promote more sustainable practices in water management.
Socially and individually, people would be obliged to learn to use less water to carry out their daily activities. They would also have to understand the different mechanisms of water recycling that exist, for example, by obtaining some of the water from rainfall (although if rainfall is too low, this would not be a very effective solution).
In conclusion, the situation would be dire, and this is why people and goverments must focus on prevention of water shortages, not on relief.
<span>Plants, Animals, and Disease between the Old and New Worlds.</span>
Explanation:
a unitary system is lead by one governing system
federal gives authority to state and local systems
The executive power has grown thanks to the social perception of international crisis. Additionally, this has caused the three branches of public power to weaken.
The central theme of the text is the transformation that the central executive power of the United States has had, influenced by different factors such as:
- Indochina War
- Watergate case
These events have caused the presidency of the United States to acquire more power to make decisions. One of the important aspects of this transformation is international politics because the influence of the international crisis made the executive branch grow in importance.
This deepened an internal crisis between the balance of powers, because the executive branch acquired more power in foreign affairs and this situation is being projected onto the national scene of the United States.
Learn more in: brainly.com/question/17905949
Note: This question is missing because the text is missing.
In the last years presidential primacy, so indispensable to the political order, has turned into presidential supremacy. The constitutional Presidency—as events so apparently disparate as the Indochina War and the Watergate affair showed, has become the imperial Presidency and threatens to be the revolutionary Presidency. . . . The imperial Presidency was essentially the creation of foreign policy. A combination of doctrines and emotions—belief in the permanent and universal crisis, fear of communism, faith in the duty and right of the United States to intervene swiftly in every part of the world—had brought about the unprecedented centralization of decisions. Prolonged war in Vietnam strengthened the tendencies toward both centralization and exclusion. So the imperial Presidency grew at the expense of the constitutional order. Like the cowbird, it hatched its own eggs and pushed the others out of the nest. And, as it overwhelmed the traditional separation of powers in foreign affairs, it began to aspire toward an equivalent centralization of power in the domestic polity.
Learn more in:
