Answer:
Supporters of Laissez faire believe that this type of system promotes more incentives to trade and economic growth, in addition to encouraging freedom among companies.
Supporters of economic intervention, on the other hand, believe that the intervention promotes fairer and more equitable trade and allows new companies to become as influential as old companies, which will promote economic growth.
Explanation:
Economic intervention allows the government of a country to impose limits and interference in trade and the productive sector. These limitations prevent economically strong companies from dominating an entire productive sector, promoting more commercial fairness and allowing new companies to emerge in addition to allowing small companies to grow in the same sector as large companies.
Laissez Faire, on the other hand, discredits any government intervention in trade and this imposes freedom on companies and industries, which will allow full production and vast economic growth.
The answer is letter A. There had been an issue during the
1787 when the issue of representation in the US Legislation had caused
problems. Larger states claimed that they should have a larger representation
the smaller states appealed that the representation should be equal amongst the
states in the US
Answer:
A.) fewer sanctions against developing economies
Explanation:
The trade agreements such as NAFTA and the EU have been of great benefit for strengthening the economies of the member countries. It has also enabled the developing countries to have much better opportunities on the market, and their economies to have much quicker development and thrive, as the sanctions are non-existent between the member countries. We can take Mexico as an example from NAFTA, as it was the one that was the least developed, but since NAFTA was formed, its economy is constantly on the rise. In the EU we can take Poland as an example. A former communist country that had lot of difficulties, since joining the EU, managed to have constant rise in its economy, and the country has been developing very well.
Answer:
What would happen if the states had the power to ignore Federal tax law they did not like? If they ignore it it could temper with the economy if they choose to except the tax it could be income for those same people. ... Road island would barely have a say in any laws that were being made.
Explanation:
Jackson prompted Congress to pass the Removal Act, a bill that forced Native Americans to leave the United States and settle in the Indian Territory west of the Mississippi River.
I hope this helped
