This is both consequence based reasoning and rule based reasoning. It is consequence based reasoning on the grounds that there is no benefit that will originate from shouting fire in a motion picture theater if there is no fire. It is rule based reasoning since they are infringing upon the real law that a lawmaking body authorized by yelling fire in a film theater.
Answer: True.
Explanation:
It is considered a major or catastrophic incident to any incident caused in a natural or provoked way, which endangers the population, infrastructure, or natural resources.
When we talk about the <u>elements of the community</u>, we refer to government agencies, such as the police and firefighters. And non-governmental organizations such as churches, social organizations, or private individuals who can offer their help.
When an incident is considered catastrophic, the entire community's response is expected to help during or after the event. For example, when a hurricane strikes an area, the help is needed to evacuate the victims (firefighters and police). Also is required people who provide food to the victims (can help church members/social organizations), and reconstruction assistance (private company, people from the community).
<em>I hope this information can help you.</em>
No the Vikings and Native Americans did