Ancien regime or the old order was a social and political system of France prior to the revolution of France(1789). Under the old regime, the king of France was an absolute despot and had centralized power in the imperial administration. The political system of France was comprised of the 3 estates which served Clergy on the first stage, Nobility on the second and the Others on the third estate. Thus the old regime came to an end with the French revolution of 1789, when the revolutionaries abolished the hereditary Monarchy and the system of French nobility.
<span>Assuming that this is referring to the same list of options that was posted before with this question, <span>the correct response would be "feudalism", since this was a very extractive economic institution that was prominent in Europe.</span></span>
Answer:
A.
Explanation:
The combination of these factors, from the question, led to the surrender of the southerners in April 1865. With the war, the south was devastated, with great material destruction and an economy in shambles. The war consolidated the abolition of slavery, the main goal of emancipation, of the across the country with the promulgation of the 13th Constitutional Amendment, and reconstruction and reintegration of the south into the Union began. The balance of the conflict was 600,000 dead, marking secession as the greatest war in the American history.
Hello,
Question - Which of the following statements best describes why President Truman fired General Douglas MacArthur in 1951? North Korea had won the war by 1951, so Truman fired MacArthur to save face. Because the war ended in a stalemate, MacArthur had not done the job he was assigned to do. MacArthur had publicly criticized Truman’s approach to the war. Truman wanted to invade China, but MacArthur had refused to lead his troops on such a dangerous mission.
Answer - MacArthur had publicly criticized Truman’s approach to the war.
<em>"'Released from foreign war, we would probably be plunged into all the misery of anarchy and intestine war. Can we suppose that the people of the south, would submit to having the seat of Empire at Philadelphia, or New England; or that the people oppressed by a change of government, contrasting their misery with their former happy state, would not invite Britain to reassume the sovereignty.” — James Chalmers, Plain Truth, 1776 </em>
If the one above is the argument, you might consider that the colonists did obtain independence from England. That by itself was something that Chalmers always thought to be impossible without serious repercussions. He used to say that in the case of achieving freedom, America would just end up being attacked and maybe even colonized by some other country. What happened, thought, was that after the revolution, other countries gained respect for America as an opponent and the country was eventually left to be.
